Thread regarding Lockheed Martin Corp. layoffs

Lockheed Martin Job Cuts Due to Pentagon Budget Cuts

Having been in the defense industry for the past two decades, we have emerged as the leading weapons and security company in the sector. With the U.S. defense department as our client, we had to lay off 4000 employees in 2013, in light of the budget cuts approved by the government.

The budget cuts had a direct impact on our revenues, and we felt the need to lay off employees, and close down our divisions in certain locations throughout the country. The slump in demand, made it necessary for us to reduce 3.5% of our workforce, and close down six locations in Ohio, Horizon City, Arizona, Newtown and Akron. We also had to close down 4 of our buildings in the Sunnyvale California campus, with a collective job cut of 2000 Lockheed Martin employees.

Around 2000 more employees were laid off at various locations throughout the country, within three different divisions of the company. The employees from the space systems unit, global solutions and information systems unit, and the mission system and the training unit section of the company, were laid off.

Marilyn Hewson, who was the then CEO of the company explained the need for these drastic measures, by blaming the budget cuts on the complexity of the security landscape on a global level. Though not ideal decisions, but employee layoffs became necessary for the survival of the company.

Our business was completely dependent on government spending, with federal contracts constituting around 80% of our total revenues, amounting to a colossal $39 billion as of 2012. The budget cuts in defense spending, robbed our company of our major earning, which necessitated the need for urgent layoffs and the closure of multiple divisions and company locations.

Ever since 2008, we have had to cut around 30,000 job positions; which amounts to around 20% of our entire global staff. In this way, we were only left with a total employment number of 116,000.

The value of our shares saw a spike after the announcement of the layoff. With improved share value, its value spiked to around 50% in that year. The global security uncertainty and the major budget cuts promoted us to take a step to lay off employees on such a large scale.

by
| 3541 views | | 6 replies (last July 13, 2015) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+AHWWVAg

6 replies (most recent on top)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am a recruiter and I am aware of various company planned lay offs. Our company is here to help individuals transition after being layed off and/or displaced from their current employment. We have offices all over the United States. If you are interested and would like to know more, please contact us for a brief discussion to see how we can find a career for you! We have immediate opportunities.

If you are not familar with the financial industry, please do not let that worry you. We provide the tools, training and support to help you succeed.

There are a few skills that we require that don't always come through in a resume, and we do require. If you are a self-motivated, hardworking individual who enjoys a self challenging profession, then please do not hesitate to contact us: johnsonjewel@hotmail.com. Let us introduce you to this fast growing industry and business opportunity.

Sincerecly,

Jewel Johnson

Recruiter

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Li4G+AHWWVAg

"The budget cuts in defense spending, robbed our company of our major earning..."

I was not under the impression the Department of Defense was ROBBING Lockheed. Thanks for clearing that for us!!

Lockheed management could NEVER, NEVER have see that having 80% of your business dependent upon one costumer is not a good business plan.

Yes, it is a wonderful day when two thousand employees get whacked! Higher bonuses for management! What a great day!

Yep, I always got a chuckle when the "Big Man" arrives in the plant with his posse in a $3,000 suit and $85,000 rolex to tell us how we have to sacrifice...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mtkr+AHWWVAg

So who in the top leadership did not see this coming for years.... that such a high dependence on military contracts for the company's existence and profitability (about 80%, and likely more of its gross revenue) is NOT a good business model..... I think all those guys should be on the layoff list FIRST.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f74B+AHWWVAg

112,000 as of February 2015

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3pEK+AHWWVAg

So, how many employees do we have now?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tjb+AHWWVAg

Good post

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mtt+AHWWVAg

Post a reply

: