Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

Comparing Citi to another big company I worked at, there’s just one difference.

The other company I worked at, and no I’m not going to tell you the company name, was a large company although not as large as Citi.

The politics was the same, the processes and procedures were a little different.
There was also the same overwhelming demand to work long hours and over the weekend. Deadlines were always shortened and rushed. Chaos also was quite prevalent.
My salary was about the same as a flat salary.

Big here’s the difference, that other company was more than willing to PAY you handsomely for it. If you put in the hours of working two jobs, then your yearly bonus reflected the difference.

The company recognized it as a compensation for your time, a trade off of slices of your life that are outside of 40 hours for that week, for a pile of cash at the end of the year. They recognized that you working like that keeps them from having to hire an extra person. An extra person that they may not need during the slow times. In turn, they had no issues paying you 30K+ as a norm for a bonus.

This is where Citi falls short. They just want the hours put in and want to forego the money payout for it. Then sum it up with “don’t go elsewhere for more money, don’t go chase the money”.

Maybe its to build cash reserves for legal fees since we can’t seem to keep from being fined.

Maybe its to build up the cash reserves to make sure Jane gets a great bonus even though we are sinking.

Maybe its to build up the cash reserves to offset the warning the board gave Jane to turn things around, to sell to the board that “all is ok” even though we are sinking. Don’t look at the man behind the curtain, as Dorthy was told.

Either way, this is the one single gleaming difference between Citi and that other company that I can see. I myself, am trying to go back to that other company. I mean, if you’re going to put in long hours, you might as well get paid as well as you can for it. You certainly won’t get paid well here at Citi for it, I can tell you that.

by
| 2491 views | | 17 replies (last January 6, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1w6EL8zd

17 replies (most recent on top)

Post ID: @25s+1w6EL8zd When Employees become silent, especially those who were previously vocal or complained about $hittybank, it's Not because the Employees finally acquiesced and agree with Citi, or “they’re quiet, we’ve got them whipped and under control now. “.
It's because the Employees have given up on $hittybank. The Employees are quietly or Not so quietly plotting their Escape Route and Exit Strategy OUT of the Penurious, Mendicant Freak $how Circus Laughing Stock Punchline of Wall Street ! LMFAO!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2aq+1w6EL8zd

The most significant worry for any company should arise when their most enthusiastic individuals go silent. I find this to be true…..but not at Citi. At Citi, its looked at as , “they’re quite, we’ve got them whipped and under control. Things are good. “

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @25s+1w6EL8zd

I cannot promise or guarantee you a job outside of Citi. Nope, I can’t do that.
I can guarantee you though 100% that you won’t find one if you never look.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @24s+1w6EL8zd

Well said OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8lhs+1w6EL8zd

Post ID: @OP+1w6EL8zd As the OP and other Posters have already posted, Unless you own your own business including as a Partner, YOU are an Expense and a Liability (NOT Asset) to the Company even if you're the Best Worker in the Company's history or if you brought in Trillions of US$ in business for the Company.

Since Employees are Expenses, we may as well Chase the Money and go work for the highest paying bidder=Employer and receive life changing Salaries, Bonuses, Benefits, etc..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7mqz+1w6EL8zd

You are right 100%. When I got here, the company wanted and very much needed expertise and proactiveness. Later it became clear that as far as Citi is concerned they expected much more than 40 hours per week. “This isn’t a 40 hour per week job”. Ok, I get that but it should not be a 60-80 hr per week either…..AS A CONSTANT. On occasion, sure, but as a constant, with absolutely no extra pay or bonus, that’s nuts. You know what they say, I was born at night but it wasn’t last night. I see this being pushed all the time to others. Work, work, work, just keep giving more and more, work late at night and on weekends, just keep giving to the company. The more often you do that, the more it becomes the norm for which Citi will always expect and give you nothing in return.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6hkq+1w6EL8zd

Sometimes you have to leave in order to level up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yhw+1w6EL8zd

Post ID: @OP+1w6EL8zd $hittybank is cheap and miserly because it's poor, destitute. Only a company that's Not profitable will nickel and dime its employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rhg+1w6EL8zd

Contractor driven company. There is a mindset that I can replace all my employees below SVP with contractors. Ditch contractors and don’t allow them to control you. If you feel your manager favors specific vendor contractors report them as he could be paid under the table. Check for any vendor parties your manager attends and report them. May be you could replace your manager after reporting with proper evidence

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zjn+1w6EL8zd

When Employers nickel and dime employees, especially the Worker Bees-Minions (below MD and Director level) for everything including but Not limited to Low or Non-existent Salary increases, bonuses, Forced Lower Performance Ratings (3s and 4s) so as to NOT give higher salary increases and bonuses, No In-seat promotions, reduced benefits (medical, dental, 401k, retirement, etc.), asking employees to subsidize and contribute money to events/parties even if it's only $3 each, Potluck lunches (BYOL=Bring Your Own Lunch), etc.., the Employers are financially and operationally unstable and penurious!

These machinations happened at Gruntal, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, BNY Mellon, etc.. With the exception of BNY Mellon which is on life-support, guess where the other financial institutions are today ??? 6 Feet Under and Non-existent !

People, read the writing on the wall and look at the CLUES around you. $hittybank is on life-support and Knocking on Heaven's Door !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1msu+1w6EL8zd

Post ID: @OP+1w6EL8zd Thank you to the OP. In Risk "Management" apparently there are employees with Not enough work to do because they have resorted to stealing and worming their way into other employees' or groups' projects or work, even with all of the MRAs, MRIAs, Consent Orders and new Regulatory problems opened by the Regulators on a near weekly basis.

Yet, some MDs and Ds have several open job requisitions for which they can split the jobs in half or one-third, give the work to current employees and then increase the salaries and bonuses of the current employees. But this is too logical. Citi's, the MDs and Ds idea of "saving money" is to hire new, external employees at higher salaries than what they're paying current employees and also pay additional headcounts' medical, dental and life insurance as well as 401k matches.

Medical, dental insurance, salaries and bonuses as well as pensions are the the biggest expenses for Citi and other banks. Citi would rather increase headcount, than simply pay current employees more money and distribute the work to the current employees.

And yet Citi still wonders why they're destitute, considered the Dysfunctional Laughing Stock Joke of Wall Street by the world and media, can Not control costs and can Not obtain operational efficiencies!!! it is literally the CitiTitanic.
Citi is SO FUBAR, Beyond Help and Hope that if it did Not get the Billions of Dollars in Bailout money from the U.S. Government during the 2008 recession, Citi would have been 6 feet under 15+ years ago and become a footnote in the history of banks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pui+1w6EL8zd

Citi looks at the market to see what’s out there. They note the pay ranges. Let’s say the average pay range for a specific skill is 90K to 160K depending on experience.
They then post a job with that pay range. So in that, yes, they are offering average market value. The offer though….that’s where the rubber meets the road. The offer given will always be 90K and they will negotiate to 95K, regardless of experience.

The listing, yes, is market value. The offer though, LOL, is never equal to what you’d get elsewhere for the experience you’d bring to the table.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vfc+1w6EL8zd

Check it out….only Citi HR or Citi managers would look at an employee wanting to be paid fair market value for number of hours worked as “whining”.

The post made by @jsy+1w6EL8zd is a classic manager or HR response to someone wanting a fair salary for the number of hours worked.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @say+1w6EL8zd

Post ID: @jsy+1w6EL8zd Likewise Citi HR. Look in the mirror! ROTFLMFAO!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qcx+1w6EL8zd

@jsy+1w6EL8zd
You can’t distract from the post, good try though.

Your reply is exactly what I’m talking about. The only way Citi would consider you too busy, would be if you were so busy you couldn’t set aside 10 min in one day to make a post. Anything less, is not busy enough. LOL. Thank you for that reply as it mirrors exactly what I’m talking about.

Too buys to make a post, no. Busy enough to make more money, you betcha.

No one said working 24hrs per day but rather 10-16 and sometimes weekends. Enough to encourage me to leave though. Like I said, Bye Felicia.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yjg+1w6EL8zd

You are not THAT busy if you have the time to come on here and whine

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jsy+1w6EL8zd

https://www.thelayoff.com/t/1w5ofZ4G

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eik+1w6EL8zd

Post a reply

: