Getting a CEO with a lot of product and market experience might help the company reach smarter decisions than has been the case since..say the early 1980s.
As an alternative, a Magic 8 Ball as CEO would cost less and still be better than the existing track record.
Foundry is going to be spun off regardless. It is more a question of how much of it is still owned by Intel. A Foundry tracking stock might be an option, to help realize value.
Pat resisted spinning out Foundry and that was a fail, but he did set it up to be split off and that was a solid win. Reporting Foundry results separate from Products brought immediate cost pressure to what had previously been a loss leader for the Product groups.
It takes time to straighten out all the gross misincentives which were part of the Foundry culture, but that is happening and it will get better over time.
Product groups have also been the beneficiary of the market forces unleashed by the new reporting structure, and that will drive down headcount and should sharpen product decisions going forward.
Intel can become far more profitable even if x86 is on a long slide to obscurity. Pat set that in motion and deserves a lot of credit for so fundamentally changing the company culture around cost. It should have been done decades ago, much to Intel shareholders deep chagrin.