Thread regarding Northern Trust Corp. layoffs

ESG Investment operations/products/staff all to be terminated by Q2 2025

the trump DOL nominee will make ESG investing illegal as a violation of ERISA and ntrs has plans to eliminate this practice to avoid lawsuits

by
| 681 views | | 3 replies (last January 4, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vual3GE

3 replies (most recent on top)

Go woke go broke!
NTRS went WOKE totally against its rich and conservative clients. It still pushes wokeism/ESG/DEI and clients have had enough. Clients are leaving and NTRS is dead as a promoter of wokism/communism in 2025.
RIP Byron Laflin Smith. You heirs wrecked the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7f0+1vual3GE

ESG investing violates the core ERISA principle of fiduciary duty, which mandates acting solely in the financial interest of plan beneficiaries.

  1. Solely Financial Interests Requirement:

o ERISA fiduciaries are legally obligated to act with "exclusive purpose" in providing financial benefits to plan participants and beneficiaries.
o ESG factors often consider non-financial elements like social justice, environmental policies, or corporate governance structures, which may not have a direct correlation to financial performance.
o Prioritizing ESG factors can therefore divert focus from maximizing financial returns, conflicting with ERISA's duty of loyalty.

  1. Risk of Reduced Returns:

o ESG-focused investments may exclude profitable industries (e.g., fossil fuels or defense) based on ethical or sustainability criteria rather than financial performance metrics.
o This exclusion could limit diversification and reduce potential returns, breaching the fiduciary duty to optimize investment performance.

  1. Lack of Objective Standards:

o ESG metrics are often subjective and inconsistent across different rating agencies, making it difficult for fiduciaries to measure financial impact objectively.
o ERISA demands a prudent process based on measurable financial criteria, while ESG metrics may reflect ideological preferences rather than consistent financial factors.

  1. Heightened Compliance Risk:

o Courts and regulators could view ESG-driven decisions as politically motivated or lacking a clear financial justification.
o Fiduciaries must document financial benefits as the primary driver, yet ESG's mixed motivations make it harder to demonstrate compliance with ERISA standards.

  1. Precedent and Regulatory Guidance:

o Historical Department of Labor (DOL) guidance has emphasized financial returns as the paramount fiduciary duty under ERISA.
o While recent guidance has softened, the foundational requirement remains that financial interests must dominate decision-making, making ESG inclusion legally risky.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7em+1vual3GE

in 2022 biden changed/LOWERED fiduciary standards to force ESG adoption.
OVER in 2025!!

https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ebsa/ebsa20221122

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ouj+1vual3GE

Post a reply

: