Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Another Failure

difficult to see this as anything other than a failure - i had high hopes when gelsinger came back, but it feels like bk caused too much damage, and gelsinger never really got control of the situation - one thing i heard that really highlighted the failure of this recovery is how bk let intel expand in all sorts of unnecessary ways that needed to be scaled back and refocused, but under gelsinger, headcount didn’t just stay the same/it actually grew significantly - it’s pointless to keep giving the same politically toxic, underperforming middle management more resources to keep failing at the same tasks - they need a major overhaul, but at this point, it’s hard to see who could actually make that happen.

tough times.

by
| 1871 views | | 7 replies (last December 5, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vNaCfqA

7 replies (most recent on top)

Mobile space...reiterate my stance... Bad decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ttg+1vNaCfqA

Pat Gelsinger getting the enhanced retirement package (ERP), but that "E" should really be in gold lettering, considering the parachute benefits that come with being a CEO, including the ability to spread the payout across three tax years (with an 18-month deferment option). Unfortunately, Pat you made several risky decisions that didn’t pay off, and I’m left with serious concerns about how little you were able to change Intel’s culture during your time at the helm. Looking back, your decision to expand aggressively while the company was already behind, and with internal divisions opting for external solutions, was a major misstep. Fab expansion was particularly foolish, though I understand it was driven by the pursuit of government subsidies.

One of my biggest frustrations with Pat was his handling of Optane. Although he inherited the decision to move forward with Optane without Micron (after the July 2018 split), he immediately decided to shut it down and exit all forms of memory as soon as he took the reins. The manner in which he handled this revealed a lack of integrity, and the level of executive doublespeak during the shutdown was among the worst I’ve ever encountered. Optane was yet another money pit that I thought held promise. Add it to the list of projects, acquisitions, that never panned out, but it was truly painful to watch cutting-edge experimental wafers be scrapped without even gathering useful data.

For Intel Foundry to survive, hitting rock bottom appears necessary—if only it had happened sooner. Intel Foundry needs to focus on becoming lean and efficient before it can think about expansion. Achieving true node superiority would be great, but what’s more important is learning how to win customers by being customer-centric. That starts with winning over internal customers. Once that’s achieved, it will be much easier to win external customers and capture market share in the foundry business. Until then, we’re essentially a packaging foundry, weighed down by depreciating assets. Hard days are ahead...

Intel Products, good luck. You needed a node edge to beat your competitors before, but now that you're on equal footing, you'll have to prove that your solutions are truly superior. The days of relying on process advantage alone are over. Now it's all about innovation, customer focus, and execution. The pressure is on to deliver, and the competition is stout.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fmk+1vNaCfqA

He didn't even make it one product or node cycle - what a loser!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @psg+1vNaCfqA
difficult to see this as anything other than a failure - i had high hopes when
gelsinger came back,

Why?
Did you consider to look at the terrible track record he had at vmware?
He was a terrible CEO at vmware.
If you believe he would be good, you didn't do your research. The Intel BOD certainly didn't do theirs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @icd+1vNaCfqA

Earlier post on target! Too many bad decisions including botched acquisitions, missing out on big technology opportunities like mobile and AI and a carousel at the executive level. We’re in a deep hole, which will be difficult to navigate out with our balance sheet. Only way out is PE comes in and takes us private and resets the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cfj+1vNaCfqA

It has to be decided what markets Intel desires to target to make money again. Mobile would require ARM to be competive and also now a portion of the desktop market. Once this is decided the company can be right sized for fabs and headcount. More layoffs should be expected in Q1 2025

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @toq+1vNaCfqA

we’ve made too many bad decisions, and everyone else has been outpacing us for years - we’re irrelevant in the mobile space, where arm architectures dominate, and in the gpu market, where nvidia leads with amd behind - our focus has been on data centers and desktop/laptop cpus, but arm is gaining ground there too with more efficient designs offering similar performance - our fab processes are still falling behind, and even we don’t have the cash to make the kind of investments needed to catch up to tsmc - it’s no surprise that globalfoundries abandoned the bleeding edge a while ago… we’re in a deep hole, and it’s hard to imagine a future where we reclaim our former glory anytime soon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qim+1vNaCfqA

Post a reply

: