Thread regarding VISA Inc. layoffs

SF payments giant Visa lays off hundreds in Bay Area after turning record $19.7B profit | Hallelujah

https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/visa-layoffs-huge-record-profit-19944933.php

The cuts come amid record profits at Visa. During the company’s 2024 fiscal year, which ended in September, Visa turned a $19.7 billion profit on $35.9 billion in revenue — an enviable margin in the corporate world. The successful financial year has driven Visa’s market cap up almost 20% since January; at a $603 billion valuation, the company is one of the 20 largest public firms in America.
San Francisco’s Visa, the incredibly profitable payments company that was recently hit with a monopoly lawsuit by the Justice Department, is laying off hundreds of Bay Area workers.The credit and debit giant announced the new cuts last Thursday in a WARN document, as is generally required in the event of mass staff reductions. The notice lists 192 layoffs in San Mateo and 10 at Visa’s headquarters in Mission Bay. They add to the 91 Bay Area layoffs that Visa previously announced in a WARN from early November.

Both rounds of November cuts slashed workers from Visa’s upper management. The first, per a Nov. 1 document, included four senior vice presidents and 17 vice presidents, 17 senior directors and 17 directors. Last Thursday’s layoffs hit two senior vice presidents, five vice presidents, 29 senior directors and 23 directors. Dozens of engineers and technical program managers also lost their jobs in the latest round. Already, a few laid-off Visa workers have flocked to LinkedIn with posts looking for new job leads and reminiscing on their careers at the company.

The WARNs seem to confirm October reporting from the Wall Street Journal, which said that Visa was planning to lay off 1,400 employees and contractors by the end of the year, with about 1,000 of those workers in technology roles. The payments company, in a September filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, said it had about 31,600 employees.

Visa spokesperson Fletcher Cook told SFGATE on Tuesday that the new cuts are part of those reported by the Journal but didn’t confirm the 1,400 total. She added that laid off workers will be offered severance packages and counseling and outplacement services.

“We expect to grow the number of employees at Visa this year, next year, and for the foreseeable future,” Cook wrote. “However, we continuously evolve our operating model to better serve clients and accelerate innovation and growth, which can lead to the elimination of some roles.”“We believe the lawsuit is meritless and shows a clear lack of understanding of the payments ecosystem in the United States,” McInerney said. “We will defend ourselves vigorously and are confident in our ability to demonstrate that Visa competes for every transaction in a thriving debit space that continues to grow and see new entrants.”

Work at Visa or another Bay Area tech company and want to talk? Contact tech reporter Stephen Council securely at stephen.council@sfgate.com or on Signal at 628-204-5452.
It’s also got a major legal problem. In September, the Justice Department announced a civil antitrust suit against Visa, alleging that the company wields its vast scale to illegally maintain a monopoly in the debit sector. Attorney General Merrick Garland accused Visa of forcing higher costs on merchants and banks, which are then passed along to consumers. The Justice Department already blocked a merger between Visa and San Francisco tech startup Plaid in 2021 with another antitrust complaint.

Cook, writing to SFGATE Thursday, defended Visa by saying there’s an “ever-expanding universe of companies offering new ways to pay for goods and services” and touted Visa’s network as secure and reliable, not monopolistic. It’s a statement similar to the one Visa CEO Ryan McInerney gave in an October earnings call.

by
| 3651 views | | 16 replies (last December 27, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vH155T5

16 replies (most recent on top)

Those 2 SVPs under the IT category, at the SFO office, marked as retirement and not cost reduction... look at their ages, there's no way they are real retirements so young. They have long tenure and are well respected by many here at FC, it is to save their self-esteem as they are being cut with a cover story. Keep watching them, they will get new jobs after their "retirement".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @urfi+1vH155T5

2 SVP under IT category: retirement not cost reduction

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9bsq+1vH155T5

Thank you for granting me this option for the payments q

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qfx+1vH155T5

Do we know who the SVPs are that got laid off? Any from SF IT teams?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dsy+1vH155T5

a department was on a very tight budget, a long time well respected senior director decided to retire early, no farewell celebration for his many years of service, his manager was happy and pleased that he 'retired' he made the comment to all his staff members "we now have more money to spend" I found his comment very repulsive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zpy+1vH155T5

what's wrong with Corporate greed? USA is Capitalism, an economic system based on private property and Free Market competition. USA always outsources to cut costs and pass "savings" onto consumers. USA enjoys a lot of well made products made overseas. Soon there will be no more made in the USA jobs and no purchasing power. Federal government will have to provide assistance cash in order to consume products made overseas. AI will replace some USA jobs = less consumers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pzf+1vH155T5

It’s called Corporate greed. CEO Ryan is a slimy thug, Rajat Taneja is a criminal who has raked up millions for himself and wants even more jobs outsourced to his birth nation India.
Nepotist Don Hobson brought in his buddy Deepak Gandhi from Halliburton, another Indian brown nose who wiped out entire teams and who thinks he will achieve nirvana using AI and automation. In fact, AI is just an excuse to farm out US jobs to India. These are the real traitors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1erz+1vH155T5

getting promoted within the department basically is who you know and whether the hiring manager likes You. I started as a contractor and later got converted into Full time
employee with extremely Low Salary, later a new department was created and I transferred to the new department, the new hiring manager bump my pathetic salary to 26% I was not expecting it, but I was Grateful. Work life is Full of Surprises :)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1uoj+1vH155T5

There is no way to reason with any of this

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wjw+1vH155T5

This year our SVP of technology Manish promoted a bunch of their underlings to VP and SVP roles. We have SVPs reporting to an SVP. Yet they all still have their jobs. Why isn't that fat being cut? Meanwhile my team lost good devs and we were told our L4s cans get promoted this year because we don't have enough of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mku+1vH155T5

It’s not about absolute profits, it’s about growth. Growth needs to be in the double digits for Visa, how else would we get our 7-10% annual increments if Visa is only growing at 9%?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @isp+1vH155T5

Feel bad for those let go. But reading the above it is the fat they are cutting which is required.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @glg+1vH155T5

Ryan will probably claim these reporters are shams too like he did with the Wall Street Journal

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yid+1vH155T5

The WSJ article forced Visa to file a WARN. lol. Yet. no WARNs in 2023 or March, June, July or August of 2024. More than 1400 (globally) have been laid off since March 2023. The total for California is much higher than quoted in the article.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dsf+1vH155T5

When will this ish end?! Record profits, yet it’s not enough. Visa’s culture isn’t recognizable anymore.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @roi+1vH155T5

Hm. We were told that somebody who disappeared on Thursday quit with no notice.

It seemed odd at the time. Perhaps that was just a line.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uhc+1vH155T5

Post a reply

: