In general, employers must follow the requirements of the WARN Act if they have 100 or more employees, excluding employees who have worked less than six months during the last 12 months or who work an average of less than 20 hours per week.
12 replies (most recent on top)
Warn notice was filed for az today. 385 for chandler, no notice yet for ocotillo.
The ISP package contains more than 2 months pay and benefits. The WARN Act was to make sure people got 2 months notice before their pay and benefits ended in order to allow time to find a replacement job. They exceeded the intent of the law.
AZ WARN search - https://www.azjobconnection.gov/search/warn_lookups/new
Nothing posted yet.
The thread is a good example of you over regulation is resulting in rapid decline in innovation, productivity and per capita income. Lawmakers regulate and put all kinds of rules and benefits in place and workers think they are protected... But long term they are worse off. Time to take the red pill NEO
started https://ccwd.hecc.oregon.gov/Layoff/WARN 1500 in SC
Notice was sent out Aug 1st by email.
SERVING NOTICE
An employer may use any reasonable method of delivery designed to ensure
receipt of the written notice at least 60 days before separation. However,
preprinted notices regularly included in each employee's paycheck or pay
envelope and verbal notices do not meet the WARN Act requirements.
There is WARN in AZ too. I think they got around it for the voluntarily, but should need to file for this round. I think the difference is they don't have to do the advance notice if they're paying the employees out for the notice period.
Filed today.
https://ccwd.hecc.oregon.gov/Layoff/WARN
https://www.kgw.com/article/money/business/intel-layoffs-oregon-hillsboro/283-f9c1df1b-1310-47c9-a99d-dc1b5a6fd554
Pretty sure that's only in certain states. In AZ, I don't think we have that.
They filed it months ago when layoffs were first announced.
I assume that’s covered by the 9 weeks of “time in lieu of redeployment” portion of the package.