Thread regarding Broadcom Corp. layoffs

An id--t’s guide for SED cleanup

Hock Tan is a very very smart operator & one of the best capital allocator in tech (look at his record in M&A, dividends & stock performance) however he has failed miserably in taking care of SED. Here is why IMHO:

  • SED is a collection of old technologies with large sticky customers but with almost no growth.
  • SED execs are masters in PPT/XLS po-n, presentations, slides, RCAs, planning, buzz words, politics and putting lipstick on a pig.
  • Their MO is: we know X did not work because of Z, we need to do X+Y-W, this will take a few quarters or a year or two then rinse and repeat.
  • All these execs are doing is buying time and having their millions in RSUs vest. They are towards the end of their careers and want to own as many AVGO stocks as possible. The dividend alone will sustain their retirement lifestyle. They have been milking shareholders massively.

Hock needs to go back to basics: ignore ALL their BS, look at the numbers such as revenue per HC, profit per HC and most importantly cost vs ROI per HC etc, fire everybody director and above (NO EXCEPTIONS, they are the RC of the problems and will scare Hock & customers before going down, in every way possible for obvious reasons, it sounds scary at first but it’s doable and the top heavy purge is right & best thing to do, talk to Elon), give teams purely unambiguous financial targets (no mumbo jumbo), bring in a few new execs who understand finance & ROI if remaining managers are confused. Alternatively make some of the good managers “who code themselves” in charge (there are some).

Finally, if this doesn’t work (although it will), divest SED.

(Derived from my original post https://www.thelayoff.com/post/@Bzxw+1rN1nTj6)

by
| 1651 views | | 6 replies (last September 24, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1urVI4Ya

6 replies (most recent on top)

LoL... managers who can code themselves... who is this guy??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ennj+1urVI4Ya

I wonder if you would kindly edit your original post and replace "he is a very smart operator" with "he is a skilled masochist that butchers any software he touches"?

Seriously though. I've sat through his coffee talks. He got lucky with semiconductors. That's the base foundation and will pay the bills. He really is not that smart. You sound like you are a bit of a bootlicker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eeij+1urVI4Ya

SED was an expensive test. CA’s Mainframe business is the benchmark. Hock wanted a something to smooth the dips so when the semi business jolts it doesn’t take the whole ship to the left of right. He is trying to do with VM as well. The issue with SED is that you have to invest a ton of time, money and people to keep up— which we don’t want to do. What we saw with SED, I wouldn’t be surprised if they did it with VMware.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sui+1urVI4Ya

OP said - make some of the good managers “who code themselves” in charge.
how will that turn the business around? haha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zgm+1urVI4Ya

he's doing a great job with VMware! oh wait..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fak+1urVI4Ya

Symantec is just a toy for Hock to play with before he tried to hunt down VMWare. CA is the same.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lle+1urVI4Ya

Post a reply

: