Everyone: 1
Shell: 1 + 1 Technical Assurer + 1 Development Planner + 1 Front End Development Manager + 1 Business Opportunity Manager + ample help from global subject matter experts/business advisors/value assurance reviewers
9 replies (most recent on top)
It takes 0. We contract it all out and then pretend to know what the work requires.
+IRM in case the lightbulb was considered to be confidential
You forgot the regulators, legal, and HSSE. What if the Engineer was planning to stand on a chair to change the lightbulb and the local laws said he must use a footstool because there might be damage to the local bacteria under the chair legs?
Most companies that are efficient don’t have ‘TAs’ at all. It’s another example of shell making pointless process that makes them uncompetitive as they say themselves!
You forgot about the permit and SWP..geezzz...LOL
We know we are inefficient when the number is non business are way more expensive and cost several people to do one person job. The profitable business are leaner and less bureaucratic than PT, and the leaders in those PT only care about “communication skills” and “leadership” because they need money from business to support them. Cut more supporting departments, you will
Find without them, you can still operate, and more effectively.
Only 1 TA? Your org must be more efficient. We’d have at least 1 to make sure we bought the right kind of bulb, 1 to tell us where the lightbulb is located, 1 to remove it, 1 for the installation process, and at least one more to make sure it’s safe to turn on.
Oh and don’t forget the Decision Executive at the end asking if we even needed to change the bulb in the first place.
but the engineer is let go
Lol and all those people get to keep their jobs.
Inefficiencies out the a-s.