I often hear discussions about outsourcing to India and other Asian countries, but as a manager overseeing several teams, I’ve noticed a concerning trend. Each time I recruit in India, individuals join and subsequently leave the job or switch to other companies within one or two years. While I understand that I’m acquiring resources at one-third of the cost, I’m speaking about critical engineering roles where skills and knowledge ought to be valued more than just a few thousand pounds.
If, after 10 to 15 years, my entire core team is based in India, I could find myself in the same position where I started, as my team members would only have two to three years of experience with the project or product. Is this approach sustainable?
Moreover, when considering IP filings from India, they remain negligible compared to those in the West and other countries. I attribute this to the tendency of employees to switch jobs every few years. I also observe that local managers frequently push employees to their limits, even when upper management has not requested such actions. For instance, they may compel employees to work weekends without justification, offer no holiday, and disregard work-life balance. This raises significant doubts about Baker Hughes’ outsourcing strategy..