https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvFTeAVMmAg
12 replies (most recent on top)
Google's hiring process got broken
around 6 years ago."... so looks like
there are more than one hypocrite
at Google, and this one if more
than 6 years there because did
not fix anything as well.
Tu-quoque encountered!
I don't mind to be called names but they need to be technically correct.
I'm a cynic. 6 years ago I escalated. I then got stopped being given interviews and given lecture on DEI .
You know you can get the horse to the waterhole...
"my only trauma with leetcode is to manage engineers that were supposed to do what the company described on job description and the entire pull only ask for the stupid leetcode questions. Then I had useless engineers without the experience the company was looking for. "
LOL. Another useless engineer manager who manages engineers by job descriptions.
@2fww+1swfeDUB "if you know the hiring process fails, you either escalate or fix it." and then "Google's hiring process got broken around 6 years ago."... so looks like there are more than one hypocrite at Google, and this one if more than 6 years there because did not fix anything as well.
TBH what you said makes you a hypocrite: if you know the hiring process fails, you either escalate or fix it. Or move to openai... Venting your frustrations anonymously here makes you look bitter.
Google's hiring process got broken around 6 years ago. Since then it's a black box style simulacrum with lottery level outcomes. On all IC levels. Slightly different for top management where they managed to get their cronies in bypassing HC and other due diligence"nonsense" reserved for plebs.
@2mkj+1swfeDUB my only trauma with leetcode is to manage engineers that were supposed to do what the company described on job description and the entire pull only ask for the stupid leetcode questions. Then I had useless engineers without the experience the company was looking for. The knowledge of system design at google is a shame and not always sd is asked.
You seem to suffer from a leetcode rejection trauma? Do you know better way to weed out all the noise generated by coding bootcamp alumnae applicants? Also system design is an obligatory round for both Google and OpenAI, so what's your point?
@1nhg+1swfeDUB LOL... or you use ChatGPT and these "newbie" mistakes will not happen. What do you expect from backend and front end developers that does not understand anything about system design ? oh.. I forgot.. they are pretty good in leetcode.
@1nhg+1swfeDUB That demo was rehearsed. If we're clapping our hands in 2024 at AI telling us to have a cache in front of a DB, humans are safe.
If it is only a "stochastic regression"
where is the Google product
with more potential than 4o ?
Project Astra
https://youtu.be/nXVvvRhiGjI?si=UTX44HiogOvdbCfZ
Former Google employee so no love is lost. riffed because of this great AI swindle.
This "demo" is 99% bloopers which we weren't shown.
And btw yes, there is no neither Google nor other party AI with a considerably different outcome: they all the same weighted stochastic models.
Not my words. LeCun's: autoregressive LLMs are doomed,
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/yann-lecun_i-have-claimed-that-auto-regressive-llms-activity-7045908925660950528-hJGk
@rin+1swfeDUB I am not surprised with this question from a Google employee... Just follow the data presented on the video comparing the models. If it is only a "stochastic regression" where is the Google product with more potential than 4o ? You should be back to your useless leetcode skill set.
Cringy. Just like google 8 hours later.
Still not wiser according to the feedback of its users. Same stochastic regression to the mean.
Can you tell me what game and how exactly is it over?