Thread regarding HP (Hewlett-Packard) layoffs

I have seen this happening across multiple corporations. What I have seen also happening is the lack of talent is leading to disastrous decisions causing revenue losses and massive expenses. Some companies are giving lip service to this initiative but smartly letting the competition destroy themselves from within.

Today, during our team meeting, our boss had to discuss feedback from this website. He acknowledged the validity of the comments and emphasized that HP Supply Chain, is actively striving to enhance diversity within the team. Even going beyond the established corporate metrics. Ernest is committed to increasing the representation of women of all backgrounds and black men in our workforce. As he holds authority, our options are to align with this vision or consider jobs elsewhere. For white males, it's advisable to update resumes as you've been kindly advised that your upward mobility is extremely limited at HP especially Supply Chain.

If you’re white and a guy, you’re going to get WFRd ahead or women and minorities. Simple as that. If you choose to not believe it, well, It’s your funeral

Let's gather in one of our team meetings to discuss this. We've spent a lot of time lately just talking about how things are getting worse in SC. It feels like we're being treated differently from other teams, expected to be in the office more and improve diversity more than anyone else. And if you're a white guy, it seems like there aren't many opportunities for advancement in SC.

We're being told to make new diverse hires feel welcome, but it doesn't seem like the same consideration is given to white male hires. If you're in that group, you're pretty much on your own. My suggestion is, if you're in this situation, talk to HR and see if there's a way to change how you're classified, maybe to something other than white male.

So, in our next meeting, I think it's important for Ernest to explain what he means by diversity candidates. What exactly makes someone a diversity candidate? And when he says that slates should be at least 50% diversity candidates, does that include white guys who are g-y or from specific places? Or is it just about not looking white? I'm guessing Ernest might brush off our questions and tell us to focus on work, but that's been my experience so far.

Diversity is great unless it's negative diversity. There are some Asian directors and managers in this PSO... And they think they're the sh-t and veterans and know it all, powerful above all. They've never seen the outside world. Bring the white peeps back!

So glad I got out of the PSO Supply chain organization years ago and got in a different group. Seems like a sh-t show over there. And they even make you RTO 3x a week to boot. Even if no one on your team works in the Spring office. Things going downhill fast with Ernest in charge.

I am in Supply Chain. Since we got our new CSCO, the moral has just cratered. We have so much to do here and he has created this back stabbing, he said/she said/they said culture where you don't know who to trust. We are all scared in Supply Chain especially those of us that are white males. He is literally taking it on to personally wipe out all white males from this group. If that is not discrimination, I don't know what the definition is. At HP, our policy is that we will not discriminate against any group. Well, I think we have a problem Houston. Do we or Don't We Discriminate. By definition, the new slate policy used in Supply Chain is discriminatory. So do we stand by our policy or is it now just words on paper?

Once again, HP proves itself to be a corporate dumpster fire. I plan to get outta here asap, 8’m done with this awful company. What a joke HP has become.

Well, our (Leaders) should learn that diversity is not about a women ratio - having 100% in a team would not make it diverse. There are good books about inclusive leadership.
As a white male, mid 40, no LGBTQ attributes you become a victim of discrimination these days in the woke culture of our company - time for a change...

I mean this shouldn’t be shocking. HP is pretty open about their discrimination against white males. I think Enrique just sent an email on national women’s day about the quota to have women in 50% of leadership positions. Just leads to more poor leadership which is prevalent throughout the company.

It seems there's some confusion between CSO and CSCO among everyone. The focus seems to be on the CSCO (Chief Supply Chain Officer) in discussions. I just wanted to clarify this point for everyone's awareness.

Today, in alignment with the HP Way, I engaged in a conversation with my supervisor here in Spring, Texas regarding information circulating within our organization and apparently now here online. While my supervisor affirmed its accuracy, he emphasized the importance of discretion, citing potential repercussions such as being targeted for termination by the CSO if I were to speak out. However, this conflicts with the core values of the HP Way, perpetuating a culture of discrimination that contradicts our commitment to diversity and inclusion. It's imperative that we address these issues openly and decisively, in accordance with the principles of integrity and respect that define the HP Way, to ensure a workplace that fosters equality and opportunity for all employees. We don't need to discriminate against white males to embrace diversity.

The sentiments shared resonate strongly, especially within the context of a company like HP. It's clear that adherence to the directives of the Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSO) is paramount within the organization, often leaving little room for dissenting voices. While the CSO champions collaboration, diverging from his directives/vision can swiftly lead to criticism and suggestions for staff replacement, a notion that raises ethical and potentially legal concerns.

The term "woke" aptly describes an awareness of biases and a commitment to addressing them. Within HP, it's apparent that diversity is valued, yet the means to achieve it, such as implementing quotas, raises complex ethical questions. Mandating a 50% diversity quota inherently involves discrimination against another group, leading to the ethical dilemma of whether two wrongs make a right.

As we navigate this issue, it's crucial to consider whether promoting diversity through quotas aligns with HP's values of fairness and equality. While diversity is undoubtedly important, it's essential to explore alternative approaches that foster inclusivity without resorting to discriminatory practices. Striking a balance between diversity and fairness is paramount in ensuring a workplace environment that upholds ethical principles while championing diversity and inclusion.

Good to know things are going well. Keep up the good work snitch.

Nice to know it’s well. Thanks for sharing.

Yep, another poster to this forum that has no idea what "woke" means.