Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

O&G salaries in free fall!

Saw this on LinkedIn.

“A great mentor and now friend of mine is an ex-oilman turned CCUS entrepreneur – a testament to the transformative times we live in. Our conversations spiral many topics from casual to insightful and recently we hit the topic of the oil and gas industry's talent drought. It’s become quite the news:

Harold Ham – “We want to get the next generation of gamechangers involved” [1]
WSJ – “Big Oil’s Talent Crisis: High Salaries are No Longer Enough” [2]

Many who have left oil and gas for greener pastures hold the notion that the industry is fading, a victim of energy transition. They think that is why we cannot attract talent. Seemingly the 'youth' don’t want to be associated with such dirty and out of fashion work.

The data doesn't follow the narrative. Yes, U.S. oil production is at a peak, but the paycheck for the effort? Not so much.

We're pumping more barrels than ever, near all-time low employment levels (see my last LinkedIn post), but O&G employees’ incomes are in a nosedive. It raises the question: why join a field where more is done with less and for less?

How can you convince someone to sign up for a 20+ year career while at the same time dropping salaries and the number of roles available year after year? The ‘kids’ are acting rational.

Layoffs and consolidations paint a picture of efficiency, but they may also signal an unsustainable squeeze on human capital. We must ask ourselves: Are we in the middle of a talent exodus because we failed to make the industry appealing, or is it simply that we're expecting champagne output on a beer budget?”

See BLS data on average salary which has fallen to 2010 levels.

by
| 1942 views | | 10 replies (last April 10, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rSMRRWj

10 replies (most recent on top)

The strategy is to lure new hires in with big salaries, the promise of career, and the fancy buildings.

If you look at the pay per hour of work, or the salary movement/ career stagnation over time, it’s not such a good deal. Not saying people should jump ship. Just don’t get complacent and delude yourself when there are other options.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6cdl+1rSMRRWj

The Company wants differentiated/winning performance vs competition, but wants it at a middle of the pack (“competitive” compensation). Maybe the right stretch goal but should recognize the disconnect.

And then also the Company wants to have efficient/leading cost structure yet staffing/succession strategies push people into roles which then needs more people around them (inefficient) to compensate for ‘collective competency” (or without the support, results in suboptimal performance).

Presume someone in leadership recognizes these objectives and corresponding people strategies are mismatched. Possibly even set in the wrong order.

Also issue likely not unique to EM.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6sbz+1rSMRRWj

Never once XOM reduce starting salary for fresh grads.....right now sitting just above 100k, which I think for engineers, is a more than decent starting point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6rzr+1rSMRRWj

...the 'youth' don’t want to be associated with such dirty and out of fashion work...

And the genX and Boomers either.

During 2021-22 big resignation the best left for other opportunities.

XOM is dead. Get the fk outta this dumpster.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xeg+1rSMRRWj

@1ldi+1rSMRRWj

Exxonmobil did reduce the salary band from a P70 to a P50 which will hurt people in their salary curves $$$. I was told many folks are sitting above 90% in their curves and don't even it know it. Well, they will once they see the steady low raises and no CL promotions. Once you hit that 90/91% you are eligible for a CL bump, but I believe the salary bands/curves are high, up to 150%+. HR can keep you in range if wanted. Anything after 90% and you getting 1/2% raises.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bvn+1rSMRRWj

That is good news

DW

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyp+1rSMRRWj

The article referenced charts and data from US Bureau of Labor and Statistics.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qjd+1rSMRRWj

ExxonMobil doesn’t reduce salaries. I think the tech sector jobs have ballooned their salaries in comparison to EM. Early career folks honestly get huge salary raises each year up until about 5 years (at least) . EM is honestly also factoring in things like medical benefits, 401K, and pension into their compensation, so they probably do pay less than others.

EM is leading the industry (literally influencing policy) in the lower O&G energy future.

EM is in the business of staying in business. We don’t keep our head in the sand anymore about the future of O&G and climate change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ldi+1rSMRRWj

According to the Boston Consulting Group, Wood MacKenzie, Solomon and Associates, and many other consulting firms, ExxonMobil average OPEX was always higher than our competition.

In order to compete long term, we need to shrink OPEX, especially salaries and headcount.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wly+1rSMRRWj

BS upstream salaries are still high

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsf+1rSMRRWj

Post a reply

: