Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

Citi is purposefully losing decades worth of institutional knowledge

I find it very interesting that many people who are getting laid off are older workers. Many of these people have been at citi for 20+ years.

Citi is purposefully losing decades worth of institutional knowledge. This place is too process heavy. It's so difficult to navigate the process layers and it's nearly impossible to identify "that one person" who can get us past a process barrier, and now citi decides to lay off the knowledgeable people??

I thought this was about "streamlining" the bank Jane, so please do tell me how making our jobs more difficult will make our daily tasks more efficient and less risky. Please do tell me how that will enhance our work life balance.

This place is done. Updated my LinkedIn today and updating my resume. Probably should've done that years ago. There is no future here.

Perfectly said, @gkr+1rIg0s7Z.

by
| 1561 views | | 7 replies (last March 26, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rJmVhRi

7 replies (most recent on top)

Honestly a lot of them were basically just collecting a check. As much as the DEI crowd folks get blamed for a lot of the problems and yes I see issues with a lot of them, but at the end of the day most of them are at the bottom of the totem pole. There was also a huge group of 20-30 year tenure employees approaching retirement who honestly aren't doing much but collecting very big paychecks. Some can go without a whole year and nobody would even notice or see any impact. A lot hidden in those big management layers, you don't even hear about them for like the whole year, they just do their quick meetings and off their day doing nothing they go.

I honestly agree with this management layer trimming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ezi+1rJmVhRi

Streamlining is great conception but something is missing.
At my team many things were automated but when you start using it you will see automation failing at 50% rate. So you need more people to support such bad quality products. And they do not want to hire anybody - just sending emails asking if somebody can help with python/perl/ksh programming at spare time without impact to primary responsibilities. So as result all automation playbooks are unpredictable. Sometimes they works, sometimes fails, many times fails and return success status. Everything has to be verified manually and take more time comparing to original vendor provided procedure. And management want to head only success stories - nobody allowed to escalate problems.

So base for streamlining is missing now. And no sign anybody want to fix it.
I am sorry to say but current technology management will fail bank. There is no future in this company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yxq+1rJmVhRi

Another thread says people with 2-3 years tenure are being let go. I think there is no rhyme or pattern to the pink slips.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pvu+1rJmVhRi

What institutional knowledge? Total BS - people in finance / banking have ZERO transferable skills. ZERO! Apart form the inherent drive / ambition.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iqc+1rJmVhRi

Started at Citi at the turn of the millennium and I recall pretty much everything I saw and read. They can pay me $500 an hour to fill them in on all the tech deployed. :-)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @enf+1rJmVhRi

What I find perplexing is this…..
Run off the older tenured people to get rid of the old timey thinking…..
Well there’s Jane and the directors under her…..they are tenured with decades of decision making behind them.

Its not the 20 year veteran button pusher you’re letting go that makes the decisions on where the company is going or how to get there. It’s the upper echelon. IF you are sticking to this unwritten guideline of running off the older people, start from the top, that’s where the stagnation is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cxs+1rJmVhRi

its a way to force the. to rebuild with their own way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zeh+1rJmVhRi

Post a reply

: