Thread regarding VMware layoffs

BCOMs strategy doesn't work in the long run

Yesterday, I had the opportunity to delve into Broadcom's financials. From my analysis, it seems their strategic approach is akin to a short-term solution—solving immediate issues without considering long-term implications. In the realm of semiconductor chips, capital investment acts as a significant barrier to entry, as it takes years to develop intellectual property (IP) and establish relationships with fabrication facilities. However, the software landscape operates differently. Companies can easily transition, primarily when the software becomes excessively costly. It's not as easy for say Cisco to leave Broadcom

Considering the exorbitant prices quoted for VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF), it seems impractical to remain tied to VMware. Investing in alternatives like Nutanix appears more sensible, especially since Nutanix is actively recruiting former VMware personnel and partners. This indicates that there isn't an exclusive market that only VMware can dominate. VCF in some scenarios has ended up costing twice as much as the entire hardware footprint for the annual subscription. Money isn't unlimited, when budgets get hit, options are on the table.

Broadcom's acquisition history also warrants scrutiny. Acquiring CA in 2018, which boasted approximately $4 billion in annual revenue, and then Symantec in 2019, with around $2 billion in annual revenue, seemed promising. Notably, the consumer segment, including Norton LifeLock, now generates roughly $4 billion in revenue annually, without the aggressive cost-cutting experienced under Symantec's new management (Broadcom). Over approximately five years, this combined entity has achieved around $1.5 billion in annual revenue growth. In contrast, VMware achieved roughly $6 billion in revenue growth during the same period, without resorting to aggressive cost-cutting measures and maintaining trust within its ecosystem.

However, Broadcom's growth trajectory seems to be plateauing. Last year, their infrastructure software revenue grew by only 3%, falling short of the average inflation rate of 4.1%. In real terms, they even experienced a decline in revenue in the previous 12 months. The year before, their growth rate was 4%, indicating a gradual slowdown. This raises concerns about their ability to meet their ambitious target of returning $94 billion to shareholders, considering the stock issued for the acquisition and the cash outlay involved. This short-sighted approach risks eventual stagnation, as customers are prone to migrate away from companies that fail to adapt.

In comparison, VMware consistently achieved a growth rate of 9% before experiencing a slowdown in 2022 due to acquisition-related challenges. The endorsement of Broadcom by Jim Cramer, while notable, doesn't alter the underlying concerns regarding Broadcom's long-term viability.

by
| 1881 views | | 13 replies (last March 28, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rJYIvh5

13 replies (most recent on top)

Did you check Hock’s track record in M&A? He’ll be more than fine. People are just frothing here to see him fail. Prepare to be surprised.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qly+1rJYIvh5

"I also looked at Broadcom's financials after the quarterly statements came out. They have a lot of debt but currently have enough cash flow to cover it, unfortunately."

Be on the lookout for the huge severance write-down costs on the AVGO balance sheet. In addition to the loan repayments, this is a big issue for the near-term profitability.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qof+1rJYIvh5

Is Jim Cramer the guy who says "I want to play a game"?

Oh, that is John Kramer.. 💀

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2afh+1rJYIvh5

He'll never stop.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2otx+1rJYIvh5

If u cle Hock stops acquiring companies he is going to hit a revenue/profit wall. Meaning game over for stock price.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ooe+1rJYIvh5

Sir, this is a place where people come to chat about layoffs. Not where Pseudo intelligent Americans can come and post their WSB style analysis.

In the words of the great Spongebob Squarepants...

Nobody cares™

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1orw+1rJYIvh5
  • You correctly note that revenue in the existing Software portfolio was slowing - why do you think they persisted with the VMWare acquisition despite all the challenges/reviews?
  • Your focus on revenue is misguided as Hock cares most about Profit. When the existing Software portfolio revenue was slowing, costs were cut to maintain the profit margin by laying off people and not replacing retirement openings
  • You don't take into account that many major Financial customers are reaping profits by loaning cash to Broadcom for their acquisitions. Are they going to transition away from Broadcom products, weakening the financial profile and putting their loans at risk?
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nbw+1rJYIvh5

Who cares about long run? Just give me my RSUs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ojl+1rJYIvh5

The reference to "Jim Cramer" makes this assessment even more laughable. Few people on Wall Street are credible in the tech sector. Those who heralded the private equity business model have had mixed results at best.

That said, AVGO has a long-term software growth strategy. When profits are flat, acquire another legacy software vendor and apply the same playbook: cut costs and raise prices.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hbm+1rJYIvh5

Forget Broadcom VMware ..now the emperor is on Board of Directors of Meta as well. Meta currently trading @500 + dont know what it did extra other than cutting the force and scrapping Metaverse to hold such large valuation .. Lord Hock has a dream to buy Nvidia as well ..he will dethrone Jensen and will become sole king of universe...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lrl+1rJYIvh5

Honest question - do any current employees post here? This poster is completely clueless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kbd+1rJYIvh5

I also looked at Broadcom's financials after the quarterly statements came out. They have a lot of debt but currently have enough cash flow to cover it, unfortunately. It figures that revenue growth for the software acquisitions would flatten after the effects of the cost-cutting changes lessen. Broadcom bought VMware to continue this practice of cost-cutting and revenue milking. I expect VMware's benefits will lessen over the next year or two, or three and Broadcom will look for another cash cow to milk. The only dangers to Broadcom's plan are interest rates on the debt rising, if bankers stop loaning $Billions, and if customers bail on VMware more rapidly than factored in to the plan, which I don't see happening. Hock Tan's business model is not a remarkable thing, he's a vulture capitalist like we saw in the 1980's. What is remarkable is that these bankers loan him $Billions. Anyone could pull a Hock Tan if they had access to money like he does.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pxc+1rJYIvh5

Broadcom only focus on quarterly results and stock price. They are not a technology company. Their business model is simple , buy established companies, cut the cost and milking the products until it dry out.
HT doesn’t believe and invest on innovation.
And HT 72 , why the he-l he would think for long term. Short term stock price pays him well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vyl+1rJYIvh5
Yesterday, I had the opportunity to delve into Broadcom's financials.

Any by "delve in", you mean ask some hyped "AI" system to write this for you?

This is a summary of history, but has no information about why it doesn't work.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fmw+1rJYIvh5

Post a reply

: