Thread regarding VMware layoffs

VMware was not that great!

Been at VMware 15+ years, now work for Broadcom.

I get the frustrations with BC that they don't communicate, and they make you figure out a lot of things on your own, but who cares?!? Companies don't exist for their employees, but for their shareholders and the customers they want to keep.

To say VMware was disorganized and wasteful is an understatement. Collaboration was rare, projects and products were stagnating and never went anywhere. Leadership was so incompetent and delusional, they never wanted to make any significant changes to the company to improve things, and instead of making the massive cuts, and implementing the focus we needed a long time ago, they turned this place into a hippy commune, and brought fighter pilots in to tell us how to be efficient, none of which had any effect. They spent millions upon millions of dollars, hiring people who could barely do anything meaningful, and instead served a distraction to those that were.

The Broadcom transition is messy and disorganized, but it's an extreme response to an extreme mess. If you were the sole owner of VMware, and it was your money on the line, there is no way in heck, that you would allow leadership to waste your money and bury the company as long as they did. Shame on the board of directors for allowing this waste and mediocrity to persist for so long.

There are still a lot of those people here, and a lot of inefficiency left to purge, but if you like Hock or not, he's finally making and implementing a lot of the tough decisions that should have been made a long time ago so this place could have been efficient and successful. Glad to see all the fluffs, hugs, and silicon valley utopia BS going away!

by
| 2661 views | | 20 replies (last February 16, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qXOotdH

20 replies (most recent on top)

That's pretty much my experience with VMware too.
If VMware was such a great company, it would have been acquired by some of the big players in the IT business like Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, or Cisco. Not by a Chinese-owned company with a focus on electronics and chip production.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9aon+1qXOotdH

Prior to Broadcom VMware was a deeply corrupt company using EPIC2 as a front. Destroyed from within by bad acquisitions, failure to ever grow out of a startup attitude and a DEI program that replaced the knowledgable and skilled employees for ones of different colors with no skill but exotic s-xual proclivities. Companies get what they deserve. And the Broadcom he-l demonstrates how deeply corrupt and immoral VMware was.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9ihi+1qXOotdH
you must be a d-mb&$$ then to stay on for 15 yrs if you hated VMware. The issue with VMware was much bigger than most understand, why VMware could never grow never the darling sweet heart of walstreet or was unable to fully control its own destiny.

It’s always been under the thumb of few individuals who held the majority of the stake board is a shame did what majority of the share holders wanted so… there lies the answer for the lack of vision and execution, as far as technology goes VMWare is awesome. There was lot to learn technology and the dos and don’t of various aspects of a company.

Ooh well … not quite sure at this point why am I responding to a sad sole who’s stuck at a place for 15 years that they hate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3wyu+1qXOotdH

That's the kind of loser attitude that allows the gross wealth disparity that's been destroying the middle class since the 70s. Nothing more gullible than a Republican with less than $10 million in net worth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cxf+1qXOotdH

A least someone from Vmware very honest in their view. Appreciate it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zca+1qXOotdH

You do know that Mr. D311 is still in the driving seat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nrr+1qXOotdH

Cute you think Broadcom’s customers love it. And maybe it was an extreme focus on employees at VMware instead of customers and shareholders as you say it. But if that’s true then how did Michael Dell sell VMware for more than all of the EMC+VMware purchase? I think you’re missing some facts here that prove VMware was valuable in spite of its employee focus. I think you can have some of taking care of all your stakeholders and still succeed. Many companies do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yig+1qXOotdH
How is Broadcom treating you like garbage?
Everyone I know who received an offer got a total compensation increase.

No. They received an offer for POTENTIALLY more total compensation.

Higher bonus percentage? At what rate does Broadcon normally pay out?
Is that payout percentage, times your percentage greater than your vmware percent -- of (staff and above) lower overall pay?

RSUs? Potential value.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ykp+1qXOotdH
t's probably because you, your manager, and leadership haven't figured out that they
aren't supposed to boil the ocean and do things solely for recognition anymore.

Why were the old managment -- the ones who ultimately created the mess by blowing sunshine up their management's fundaments instead of the truth -- retained?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bij+1qXOotdH

15 years and you hated everything about it? What are you a tree? Why didn’t you move? Not attractive out there in the job market? And attractive comp plans?? Is that why Ireland said fu-k off and France is suing? Comp plan I got means fu-k all when in the contract it reads they can change anything at any point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vpd+1qXOotdH

VMWare had it's issues, but they were way better at getting folks the info they needed to make decisions.

Broadcom is running a threadbare operation, and it shows.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fvz+1qXOotdH

VMware was definitely experiencing some challenges - many self inflicted.

However it was a people first company. Had M. Dell not been so intent on a sale they would have been in much better shape, focusing on customers rather than a sale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wvt+1qXOotdH

I agree with this thread. It's 100% on the C-Level who did not trim the VMware portfolio and kept inflating the employee roles without staying focused on the EcoSystem and value. The dye was cast when Mr. D311, whom i consider to be the real root of the problem - bought Evil Machine Corporation and along with it a controlling interest in VMW. This whole arranged sale, multiple times with a spinout in the middle did exactly what it was designed to do. it helped D311 make debt payments on his 67Billion purchase of Evil Machines..

So, we can blame lots and lots of leaders for getting us here. I don't think blaming Mr Tan really makes sense because he's doing exactly what a buyer always does.. exactly what he wants.

I'm just so very grateful that I have a "severance package" and can exit gracefully into the work world and leave this whole "Bought and sold" saga behind me.

Gratefully former vmw,
HockEmHorns,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udk+1qXOotdH

AVGO and Hock Tan Best.
Return to office, work for the company and make money as a team.
Fire the people not coming to office. Good riddance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oia+1qXOotdH

Am I the only one that was happy in VMware? But in my team I can wholeheartedly say we collaborate very strongly, most of the people in the team are people that have been in the company for decades so maybe that makes a difference idk. We’re a very small team but we do have a strong team spirit and support each other.

I’ll be leaving along with many of my tenured colleagues on the 23rd, the rest of team are people that can’t leave easily because of visa and family responsibilities. It’s definitely feels like end of an era for a few of us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xoa+1qXOotdH

"Which candidate would Broadcom hire, and which would VMware hire?"

In my experience BC would hire the first, and VMware no longer exists so your point is both moot and childish - like most posts here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oeg+1qXOotdH

"That doesn't mean you get to treat your employees like garbage though."

How is Broadcom treating you like garbage? Everyone I know who received an offer got a total compensation increase.

If you feel overworked, it's probably because you, your manager, and leadership haven't figured out that they aren't supposed to boil the ocean and do things solely for recognition anymore. You are only supposed to focus on the things that bring in revenue, save money, and streamline the business. Get rid of the old VMware mindset, and move forward.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xvz+1qXOotdH

Two candidates walk into a VMware job interview...

The first candidate says "I have more than 20 years of experience in the industry, am well-known in the tech community, and have a record of bringing products successfully to market, delivering large and sustainable margins while running teams more efficiently."

The second candidate says "I have less than 5 years experience in the industry, but I am certified in OKR methodology, believe in strong company culture and values, diversity, and speak fluently in platitudes."

Which candidate would Broadcom hire, and which would VMware hire?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sik+1qXOotdH
Companies don't exist for their employees

That doesn't mean you get to treat your employees like garbage though. It is possible to run a company without making it quite so obvious that you wish 50% of your acquired staff would simply quit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wor+1qXOotdH

VCF and Ops and OCTO went on an empire building spree a few years before the acquisition, and those people more interested in politics over revenue are still ruining it for the rest of us who were happy to see BCOM come to clean up. It's going to take a lot of continuous effort to shift that group of leaders out of the way long enough to fix things.

There was no happy commune, there was fighting stupidity every day.

Hopefully it continues to get better as those legacy VMware leaders fail to measure up to the new standards.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yif+1qXOotdH

Post a reply

: