Thread regarding Nielsen layoffs

Why has Nielsen quality declined over the past several years?

I was a long-time employee and laid off last year. Here are a few reasons I think quality has declined in Nielsen products over the past several years:

  1. No more dedicated testing resources: No QA no UAT. None whatsoever in the App Dev areas. Developers are doing it all and testing their own code, yikes!
  2. A lot of permanent employees with good business and data knowledge have been laid off. Remaining people are like fish out of water, struggling to get by on limited resources.
  3. Non-permanent employees jump around from job to job and we lose system and data knowledge, and we need to spend time to train new people, which is a waste of time to do so regularly.
  4. Non-permanent employees don't have the same ownership of their work because they won't be around to see the consequences. They take short-cuts and create technical debt.
  5. Quality and timeliness have lower criteria in other countries as compared to the United States.
by
| 1381 views | | 2 replies (last February 9, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qUzXmyB

2 replies (most recent on top)

I've always said Nielsen is one good idea from the competition away from bankruptcy. Clients hate working with Nielsen, but they have no other choice. Once a better alternative comes around, and it will, Nielsen will be bankrupt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8rrv+1qUzXmyB

Nielsen has imputation upon imputation and so much data modeling. Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone will pay for our data. And it's true, that they have gotten rid of all the quality assurance dedicated resources. That tells you how much they value quality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5axi+1qUzXmyB

100% true. I see the same situation around multiple departments... :(

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hyd+1qUzXmyB

Post a reply

: