Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

One sided risk

To me the point is, is that if nothing changes on a management decision making level, we will continuously be at this juncture. We are “here” due to poor decision making by those who reside protected in their ivory tower. The risk is one sided for bad decisions made and the risk is not on the decision maker’s side.

The bottom line, no one cares that Jane is the first CEO, no one cares if we are DEI aggressive or not. These are not reason’s alone to make people come running to Citi, to give them Citi’s business.

People do care though, if you lose $ by giving it away to to wrong company. People do care if you have a habit of collecting regulatory fine’s. (plural). People do care if you give yourself handsome rewards as a leader for very poor, lackluster performance. On the subject of consulting with Buffet a Citi stock holder, well, I’ll leave that one alone.

by
| 871 views | | 2 replies (last January 22, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qGOhbIc

2 replies (most recent on top)

Warren didn’t even think that report of what she told employees “warranted” a full response, he just said yea we had lunch… and so what?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xzu+1qGOhbIc

I promise you, Jane has absolutely nothing to worry about. She’s taken well care of herself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rzx+1qGOhbIc

Post a reply

: