Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

A regime change is needed. Jane needs to go.

I don’t think there’s a word invented yet to express how little they care about the emotional, mental, psychological effect a layoff may have on anyone before, during or after the holidays. Don’t kid yourself by thinking that they do.

You can justify it anyway you want. “Business need” , “trimming the fat” , “streamlining” etc…it doesn’t matter how you package it the end result is the same. It’s happening and they don’t care.

A CEO has two core metrics for which they are measured.

  • First, make the stock move up. So lets look at that shall we. Its laughably low since she’s been CEO so that’s a wash. Designing a company to reflect YOUR political beliefs somehow didn’t magically make the stock go up. New customers didn’t break the doors down in order to give us their business because you did such.

Second, take care of your people. Well, you see how that’s going. You’re letting people go before the holidays no doubt. So we hired like never before and promoted like never before in order to fulfill YOUR political vision, now we have to let people go because we are too fat. Too many layers. Too many manager levels. You did manage to take care of yourself though, right? Giving yourself a huge bump in pay while other banking CEO gave themselves a pay cut during hard times. Very classy move, cover yourself while your underlings suffer. Well played on breaking that glass ceiling. It’ll be a great chapter for your book.

So, no vision, that’s for sure, no positive market moves, you can’t argue with the charts on that one and no use to even mention again how you take care of your people.
You’ve failed on your metrics. Its time to move on. You did the best you could…..I guess…you can look at it anyway you want just so long as you leave. Just go.

by
| 2031 views | | 9 replies (last February 18, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1pru9xhj

9 replies (most recent on top)

Jane is focusing on selling off parts of Citi. Once she’s done trimming it down. She’ll take a retirement leave. You’ve seen it before in other companies. They bring in a hatchet man, once done, they leave. Someone else comes in to pick up the pieces.

A common mistake made is in thinking that Jane actually cares about you when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1Hfok+1pru9xhj

Remove all the leadership at the top and replace them with visionary leaders!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3cha+1pru9xhj

Upper mgmt has failed miserably. Jane is going by the only plan she’s picked up from Corbat, layoff. She knows nothing else. The next thing she’ll do after the dust clears, is to come up with a master plan which is to hire more talent. Which translates to ‘replacing those I let go’, but sell it as a plan for growth. LOL The corp world is funny.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lxj+1pru9xhj

@1zrk+1pru9xhj while you meant to do your social justice warrior thing to put the poster in their place, you proved their point.

Yes, Corbat and Jane are cut from the same cloth. Old regime thinking that clearly does not work. As another poster said, If you want more of the same, keep Jane. If you want things to be better, get some new blood male or female, don’t care, just some new blood with new thinking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iex+1pru9xhj

Is it because Jane is a woman? The last CEO Michael Corbat did the samething. You must be new to Citi

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zrk+1pru9xhj

100% Agree with Original poster! change of leadership needed badly and immediately!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nzz+1pru9xhj

I personally think Jane deserves a significant raise every year regardless of what the stock level is or what the overall health of the company is. I think if the stock continues to flatline or go even lower we should just layoff more people to offset bad business decisions. Whatever it takes to protect Jane, is exactly what we should do.

GO JANE!!!!! You rock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vid+1pru9xhj

Its down to the board. If the board wants more of the same, then by all means stick with Jane. If the boards truly wants a change, then prove it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uhm+1pru9xhj

Time for someone else to lead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wjh+1pru9xhj

Post a reply

: