I joined the RIF also, out of the blue. Hearing that they need to reduce 2k staff globally from 7k total. If that is correct, then you aren't getting due settlement in my opinion.
5 replies (most recent on top)
There were also questionable choices made — likely to avoid triggering the WARN act in California. My direct peer in Europe was let go, but I remained and am located in San Diego.
Now I am curious if it was cheaper to spare a San Diego based role in name of the WARN, than it was to layoff someone in that country?
One thing HR did was to promote hybrid remote work so everyone is scattered with remote home office. Unless you have 50 or more from a single location where the employees report to, no WARN act is issued. They've done much to ensure this massive layoff, scattered over many quarters don't get attention and scrutiny of potential age discrimination lawsuit.
Why was WARN Act not triggered?
TD HR states CARE act California did not trigger even with this large layoff. Very Strange.
What date is it for you?