That is what Hock said recently, as reported by Krish in a recent meeting.
To me, this means that the day-to-day operations of the job will not change (with the exception of Return to Office that is!) But what this really means to me is that Broadcom intends to be an absentee owner, or at least a very hands off owner.
They bought this business to ring the cash register, not run a business. Which means that aside from the broad strokes like RTO, I don't think Broadcom will say much in the day to day of any of us. We will pretty much be autonomous business units, each expected to return a certain amount of profit, but however that is accomplished they don't care.
The upper management is certainly on board. Krish in that same meeting told us that "Moving over to Broadcom is like getting a new job. You have to change because they aren't going to change for you. So you have to decide if this is for you."
That's a lot of candor from a VP, and I think he means it. I think he was bluntly honest on purpose. This is Broadcom, folks. This is how they operate, is what he was saying.
So yeah, VMware is no longer VMware. And he made a good point I think, that this is like getting a new job, and you have to adapt to the culture. The difference is, I wanted to adapt to VMware culture. I applied to VMware and was thrilled to be hired. I didn't apply to Broadcom.
Looks like I have a decision to make. We all do.
Ha! Captcha: 42