Thread regarding VMware layoffs

Broadcom Acquisition: A Paradigm Shift in Management Dynamics at VMware

Managers across various business units have been struggling to assert their relevance. It has become abundantly clear that, in general, most first-line and middle managers will become irrelevant once the Broadcom acquisition is finalized. Broadcom is intensely focused on enhancing individual contributors' productivity and their direct contributions to customer value. Broadcom has no interest in workplace politics or favoritism.

Several business groups have endured a prolonged period of favoritism. Many seasoned individual contributors who have spent several years at VMware are well aware of the favoritism that most times influences promotions and bonuses. Despite this, it is important to note that merit and competence ultimately prevail. However, in the meantime, many engineers have suffered, feeling alienated and targeted due to the incompetence of certain managers.

Many of the managers, directors, senior directors, VPs, and even a general manager who were investigated by independent private investigators for favoritism and other allegations are no longer with VMware. However, the toxic footprint and impact on engineers and employees have long outlasted their forced departure. The damage to the culture proved irreparable.

A significant number of existing managers, who were remnants of that toxic regime, have persisted and attempted to survive by hiring junior engineers and 'Yes' men. These unwitting junior engineers unknowingly aided them in their toxic 'divide and conquer' mission, all in an effort to secure their own positions."

This doesn't exempt individual contributors, especially those with an unbearable ego. I'm referring to individual contributors who perceive themselves as the gods of science and innovation. Yes, you guessed it – the individual contributors within the CTO office across VMware's various business groups. These individuals have been consuming resources, engaging in mutual back-patting and paper approvals within their own circle, all in an attempt to carve out relevance for themselves. This behavior is concerning in a public company that should primarily be focused on the best interests of investors and profitability.

Experienced engineers and other individual contributors within the organization are expressing a strong desire for Broadcom's forthcoming takeover. Their primary aspiration is for impartial and non-toxic leadership, a need they believe Broadcom can fulfill. A prevailing sentiment among these contributors is that maintaining their current reporting structure, which is uniformly overseen by the existing management chain, will likely impede their productivity. While there may be exceptions to this perspective, the prevailing consensus suggests that the integration of the current management chain into Broadcom could, in most instances, result in the inevitable failure of these individual contributors.

by
| 4311 views | | 13 replies (last October 19, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1p7vHquY

13 replies (most recent on top)

13 years @ VMW, I have seen the bad, but much more good. I agree that the CTO org needs either to be massively overhauled or removed. The other one is the TAM group, of the hundreds of clients I have worked with, only 3 TAMs have even been helpful!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hgj+1p7vHquY

As someone who has worked at VMware for over 10 years I can attest this is true and still going on. Hopefully Broadcom will axe most directors and senior directors. The majority of whom have helped destroy VMware over the last 5 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hqr+1p7vHquY

Still grinding that ax about Nyansa, yawn. How many years now have you been whining about this and you are still here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jwv+1p7vHquY

TLDR:

  • Managers at VMware are struggling to assert their relevance, especially first-line and middle managers.
  • The Broadcom acquisition aims to enhance individual contributors' productivity and customer value, focusing on performance rather than favoritism.
  • Favoritism and workplace politics have been prevalent in some business groups at VMware.
  • Investigations led to the departure of some managers accused of favoritism, but the culture damage remains.
  • Some existing managers have tried to survive by hiring junior engineers and 'Yes' men.
  • Individual contributors in the CTO office have engaged in self-serving behaviors.
  • Experienced engineers and individual contributors hope for impartial leadership with Broadcom's takeover.
  • They believe that the existing management chain could hinder their productivity and prefer a change.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nez+1p7vHquY
A significant number of existing managers, who were remnants of that toxic regime, have persisted and attempted to survive by hiring junior engineers and 'Yes' men.

plus one to this, lots of tribalism in SASE

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qqu+1p7vHquY

The AI bots are now chiming in on TLO LOLOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xho+1p7vHquY

Spot on. Speaks my mind. Thanks. Been at VMware for over 5 years. Seen all the toxic environment in various BUs. Fingers crossed, let's hope Broadcom will change all that on day 1 with fresh new leadership. None of the existing managers or directors should be allowed to stay.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uus+1p7vHquY

Bs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cvk+1p7vHquY

😒
What a waste of one minute read. I thought I was reading something relevant. I was thought at a very young age
1- Don’t speak emotionally and try to be specific and truthful
2- Don’t generalise stuff
3- & If you don’t have something relevant to say keep quit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rli+1p7vHquY

Thanks for the TED talk

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rga+1p7vHquY

Speaking as someone working inside VMW, all of the claims here seem false. I'm not aware of any of this dissatisfaction or dysfunction. I'm not aware of any engineers who are looking forward to Broadcom taking over.

I mean, this could all be true and found in different areas of the company I haven't worked in, but this feels like fantasy fiction. It's all non-specific and cartoonish.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @evs+1p7vHquY

Non sense post. Wasted time reading it. Get some dude and stop saying irrelevant contents

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jyt+1p7vHquY

@OP+1p7vHquY what was your question to Brad or ChatGPT?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vvv+1p7vHquY

Post a reply

: