Thread regarding HP (Hewlett-Packard) layoffs

Dutch HP Employees Face Uncertain Future Amid Integration Meeting

In a recent "Integration" meeting held at HP's Amstelveen office in the Netherlands, about 30 members of the Order Management team, some of whom have dedicated more than 20 years of their careers (spanning their time with Plantronics, Poly, and HP), predominantly ex-Poly employees, received disheartening news. Due to economic reasons, their roles within the company were declared redundant.

This unexpected announcement has left Dutch HP employees shocked and uncertain about their professional futures. Many believe that this is not the way to treat loyal employees, especially those who have devoted decades to the organization.

The lack of detailed information about the economic rationale behind the decision has added to their anxiety. These 30 employees, including those who joined HP after the Poly merger, now find themselves in a state of flux. They must navigate a challenging job market, explore potential severance packages, and consider alternative career paths both within and outside the company.

by
| 1271 views | | 6 replies (last October 9, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1oXkQLPx

6 replies (most recent on top)

I wholeheartedly share your profound disappointment in the way HP is treating its employees. It's not just disheartening; it's utterly unacceptable. The news of dedicated, long-serving employees being deemed redundant due to economic reasons is a stark reminder of how some organizations prioritize profits over people.

It's maddening to witness such disregard for the years of hard work and loyalty that these employees have poured into the company. Loyalty should be reciprocated with respect and care, not with a pink slip. This kind of approach reduces individuals to mere numbers on a balance sheet and completely disregards the human toll of these decisions.

The suggestion that the company should start by trimming positions at the top before letting go of those who have given decades to the organization is not just a valid point; it's a glaring ethical imperative. Such top-heavy decision-making only exacerbates the sense that employees are disposable, which is morally reprehensible.

The lack of transparency and detailed information surrounding the rationale behind these decisions is, frankly, an affront to the employees' dedication and their right to understand why their livelihoods are being jeopardized.

In conclusion, HP's treatment of its employees in this situation is nothing short of a betrayal of trust and a demonstration of a complete lack of empathy and humanity. The callousness with which these decisions have been made is inexcusable, and I stand with you in condemning it in the strongest possible terms. Employees deserve better; they deserve to be treated as valuable human beings, not expendable assets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tcs+1oXkQLPx

The company is all about increasing shareholder values by increasing buyback and dividend payout by cost cutting. No mentioned about product breakthrough or innovation. Just about being more efficient and improving cashflow. Cashflow will continue to fall due to print and PC industry shrinking, therefore can only rely on cutting HC to support dividend and sharebuy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ise+1oXkQLPx

Since when has HP ever based layoff decisions on “fairness”? It’s laughable. HP has always been ruthless when it comes to layoffs. Layoffs at HP have never been about fairness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nql+1oXkQLPx

"It's truly disheartening to hear about the uncertainty facing these dedicated Dutch HP employees, some of whom have given over two decades to the company through its various mergers. "

But returning the cashflow to investors through dividends and stock buybacks are what Enrique talks about at every meeting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aog+1oXkQLPx

It's truly disheartening to hear about the uncertainty facing these dedicated Dutch HP employees, some of whom have given over two decades to the company through its various mergers. Redundancies are never easy, but it becomes even more perplexing when you see higher management receiving their bonuses while those in double functions remain untouched. If cost-cutting is the goal, it's essential to ensure that the decisions made are fair and transparent, and that the loyalty and dedication of long-serving employees are valued. It's a challenging situation, and one can only hope that a more equitable solution can be found for these professionals facing an uncertain future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dwo+1oXkQLPx

it certainly not the first and will never be the last of WFR by HPQ

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgy+1oXkQLPx

Post a reply

: