Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

I WARNED YOU ABOUT THE NEXT ROUND

Qualcomm is laying off 84 people in Santa Clara. Next is SD and other offices. They are laying off a little at a time as to not sound any alarms. πŸ””πŸ›Ž

by
| 2541 views | | 8 replies (last June 22, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1naFRJxe

8 replies (most recent on top)

Heard San Diego CE and Program Management will take a big hit in next round. Positions all going elsewhere. Maybe the customers will stop complaining about unhelpful people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5qac+1naFRJxe

All non-management positions are next.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jfr+1naFRJxe

There will serious layoff in the PMIC group in San Diego.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gyi+1naFRJxe

U.S. chip giant Qualcomm is laying off around 30 employees in Israel, which is about 5% of its local workforce. The layoffs are the latest in a series of cutbacks at the company that saw dozens of local employees lose their jobs earlier this year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udf+1naFRJxe

SD cuts in June!

Santa Clara cuts in June!

MORE CUTS CIMUNG !!!!!!!!!!!! I warned everyone. πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””πŸ””

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wiz+1naFRJxe

πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•πŸ”•

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lgi+1naFRJxe

Q expected to reduce operating expenses amid the global economic slowdown and bloated inventories at smartphone markers.

β€œGiven the current macroeconomic and demand environment, we’re implementing further spending reductions and streamlining operations without losing sight of the significant growth and diversification opportunities ahead,” said Amon. β€œThis is consistent with our commitment to actively manage operating expenses as indicated during our last earnings call.”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jal+1naFRJxe

Layoffs are going to persist because of a decline insales.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wgq+1naFRJxe

Post a reply

: