Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Why no news/media outlets reporting Q layoffs is it they don't bother about Q if that's the case how stock will be attractive to investors

by
| 4491 views | | 14 replies (last May 23, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1mH1zpaD

14 replies (most recent on top)

Where is it Bro? The act you are talking about

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4ujb+1mH1zpaD

WARN act was triggered, it will be reported.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2far+1mH1zpaD

media is busy with AI hype by the likes of openAI Nvidia etc. Q just isn't relevant and a waste of the audience attention span. At most san diego tribune will feature a news story

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xhg+1mH1zpaD

WARN act cannot be managed! And there has NEVER been a time when media was paid off in past layoffs! Whatever you are smoking tell me where you got it bc that $hit is strong!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dvq+1mH1zpaD

Numbers are small, or some things are still ongoing, or reporting is delayed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ecj+1mH1zpaD

Media can be managed. Pay them they will do what you tell them to do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qdr+1mH1zpaD

Most mismanaged layoff by management
They did layoffs but could not even leverage this unfortunate situation to boost stock price

The performance of executive management is easily gauged by the stock performance..

We all know how stock is doing

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xek+1mH1zpaD

Volunteer retirement is not layoff. Majority employees are volunteer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yii+1mH1zpaD

Good observation, I'm surprised why when 1000 people were let go, there is no news.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oli+1mH1zpaD

News articles were posted when San Diego only let go of 53 employees earlier this year. Also, a WARN act was filed with the state of California. No WARN act filed and not a single article saying layoffs happened on the 17th!

If less than 53 employees were let go it was not a layoff - it was a performance firing!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ufg+1mH1zpaD

A simple and short answer: layoffs outside the US are done yet. You would see some changes coming to Qualcomm China in next few weeks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mfo+1mH1zpaD

Although I agree that’s the logic for any company but not just for qualcomm

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dcu+1mH1zpaD

actually layoff would be good for ws and stock should go up if opex goes down.

I find it very odd and really question the magnitude of the alleged layoff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sjf+1mH1zpaD

Good question, my thoughts are that, it may further give bad impression to the ws. Any news is bad news for qualcomm.
Also CA neither cares about employees nor investors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jye+1mH1zpaD

Post a reply

: