Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Bring Vivek Ramaswamy or Murthy as CEO to end affirmative action in Qualcomm

Or he's better off doing that for whole America.
If Murthy was here instead of CA, it would have been a completely different.

  1. Broadcom would not have tried hostile-takeover, that was the downfall and loss of trust by street for QCOM
  2. Apple would not have started their modem.
  3. Would have easily let go off VPs, Sr Dir, all the fat. Ironically those are the ones deciding who to let go, instead of their own departure. CA doesn't have guts to do this.
  4. Mtek would not have given so much pain to Qualcomm.
by Anonymous
| 2701 views | | 7 replies (last May 19, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1mGKpGwo
Comment! It's anonymous!

7 replies (most recent on top)

current CFO is a disgrace.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zzk+1mGKpGwo

Lolol cuz Intels mobile division did so well under Murthy

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ufj+1mGKpGwo

Yeah I am thinking the answer is somewhere outside of Murthy and CA, not to mention current CFO.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @mah+1mGKpGwo

Murthy destroyed intel

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @zfl+1mGKpGwo

If you can't survive hostile and constantly whine that you are a victim, you never go anywhere. execution under Murthy would have been 10 times better.

Are you saying Apple is not hostile now or under Jobs?
Tesla is not? Look at Elon. He'll fire on the spot if you don't perform.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsu+1mGKpGwo

It was hostile under Murthy. The verbal abuse and profane language made for some very difficult situations. People deserve to be treated with respect.

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @foe+1mGKpGwo

Very well said

by Anonymous
| | Reply
Post ID: @uzy+1mGKpGwo

Post a reply

: