That's what I hear. QCOM sucks at keeping their commitment to CPU dev
7 replies (most recent on top)
It takes a long time to do uninspiring tasks.
Like duplicate an existing cpu design.
Plus they don't have any reason to deliver.
CA wants it, so they draw this out as long asyesterday. Measured in years and canceled programs.
Imagine what they would do if they were on the chopping block. They would deliver yesterday and have actual product to backup the B.S. talk.
But again, why bother when you aren't doing inspiring tasks and the $$$ isn't coming to an end.
A misaligned BU if I ever saw one.
Over 2 years and these guys have produced nothing. What a $1.4B waste. At least the first original Snapdragon CPU team delivered award winning cpu
Its a cpu.
Commodity.
That ARM already sells.
Who wants to waste their life redoing what is already on the shelf. How uninspiring of an investment.
Q knows this too. They just forgot about that temporarily for the 2nd time.
I'm not being cheeky. Q thought an Arch License would save them $$$. And now that reality has landed. Nuvia value is marginalized back to commodity bean counter status.
Is Nuvia not doing good ?? Any insights on how are projects going on for Nuvia !!
What do you expect from former apple (big business) employees.
Efficiency? Baaaaahhhhh!
Rest and vest. For sure.
I heard the same. These Nuvia guys said that they were extremely efficient at development. Now they are up to 500 people, time to clip their wings.
"QCOM sucks at ...."
Say no more. You had me at sucks.