Thread regarding Kyndryl layoffs

Was chatting with the BARD AI and this was the response I got

"Kyndryl's behavior in regards to layoffs does indicate a culture that is not focused on the retention of employees. The process lacks transparency, empathy, and any compassion. This could damage their reputation, as it could make potential employees and customers think that Kyndryl is not a good place to work or do business with.

There are a few things that Kyndryl could do to improve their reputation in this regard. First, they could be more transparent about the reasons for the layoffs and the process that they will be using to determine who is laid off. Second, they could show more empathy for the employees who are being laid off and provide them with more support during this difficult time. Finally, they could make sure that the layoffs are carried out in a way that is fair and respectful to all employees.

If Kyndryl takes these steps, they can help to mitigate the damage to their reputation and show that they are a company that cares about their employees."

It seems to be way smarter than the executive team.

by
| 1873 views | | 4 replies (last April 1, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1lVYfe71

4 replies (most recent on top)

Fu-k generative AI... this is the worst invention ever and will get ki-led by humans pretty quickly. The CEOs that claim that AI is good because it can replace jobs are either trying to pocket money in the short-term or are totally delusional... once you replace people by AI, that is that many consumers that go away... what happens in an economy where you have a lot less consumers (people spending their money to buy services, products, etc...), well companies start shutting down and closing doors.

AI is absolutely bad and will probably bring this capitalist system down to its knees... now, there are certainly some people who would love that... the real question becomes what happens after the current system (capitalism) goes away, what is the next system of order going to look like?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lri+1lVYfe71

Jobs are moving to fu----g asia

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwp+1lVYfe71

I also asked it -

"what moral and ethical framework do you use to generate responses to questions that have those components to them?"

And received -

"I use a number of moral and ethical frameworks to generate responses to questions that have those components to them. These frameworks include:

The principle of respect for autonomy. This principle holds that people have the right to make their own decisions and to control their own lives. I try to respect people's autonomy by not making decisions for them or by trying to control their behavior.
The principle of beneficence. This principle holds that we should act in ways that benefit others. I try to act in a way that benefits people by providing them with information and by helping them to solve problems.
The principle of non-maleficence. This principle holds that we should not harm others. I try to avoid harming people by not providing them with inaccurate information or by not giving them advice that could be harmful.
The principle of justice. This principle holds that we should treat people fairly. I try to treat people fairly by giving them equal consideration and by not discriminating against them.

I also use my common sense and my understanding of human nature to generate responses to questions that have moral and ethical components. I try to understand the perspectives of all involved parties and to generate responses that are fair and reasonable."

So it seems the responses were drawn using those foundational beliefs. Kinda damming then that the AI is more compassionate and empathetic in its responses than human management. I get that it's a chatbot, but it is interesting that the moral dimension of the behaviors on display is obvious even to it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @peo+1lVYfe71

"There are a number of reasons why corporations behave in such a secretive manner when layoffs are involved.

To avoid a morale crisis. Layoffs can cause a lot of anxiety and uncertainty among employees, and corporations may want to avoid this by keeping the layoffs a secret as long as possible.
To protect their stock price. Layoffs can often lead to a decline in a company's stock price, and corporations may want to avoid this by keeping the layoffs a secret until they are absolutely necessary.
To avoid legal problems. Layoffs can sometimes lead to lawsuits from employees, and corporations may want to avoid this by keeping the layoffs a secret.
To give themselves time to plan. Layoffs can be a complex and time-consuming process, and corporations may want to give themselves time to plan them out carefully before announcing them.

However, it is important to note that secrecy is not always the best way to handle layoffs. In some cases, it can actually make things worse by causing more anxiety and uncertainty among employees. It is important for corporations to weigh the pros and cons of secrecy before deciding whether or not to use it."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yyg+1lVYfe71

Post a reply

: