Thread regarding General Atomics layoffs

RTO / Quiet Layoff!

After 6.5 years of successful remote and hybrid work, leadership decided employees must return to the office more than half the time. Despite years of strong performance, increased productivity, and record results, management couldn't even provide a basic explanation for the decision.

The announcement itself perfectly reflected the company's culture. After months of rumors and speculation, employees were informed through a Teams meeting while many of us were already sitting in the office. Cameras were off. Employees were muted. Questions were not answered. Instead, we were told to ask our managers for information that leadership should have communicated directly.

The return-to-office rollout has been just as poorly executed. Some employees have been separated from their managers, collaboration has become more difficult, and basic equipment and workspace issues remain unresolved. Apparently, requiring people to commute was a higher priority than ensuring they had functional tools to do their jobs.
What makes this especially frustrating is that employees spent years proving that remote and hybrid work could be successful. The company benefited from our flexibility, commitment, and results. Now we're expected to accept a major change without transparency, accountability, or even the courtesy of a meaningful conversation.

This experience has made it clear that employees are viewed as resources to manage, not people to respect!


by
| 1 view | | 3 replies (last 2 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kt4jh80q

3 replies (most recent on top)

What’s frustrating is that they are now LESS flexible than they were pre-Covid. If an employee had an appointment or had to pick up their child, they were allowed to work their remaining few hours at home. Not everyone lives close to work, so it makes sense that if you have an hour left to work, you can work it from home.

Furthermore, why did we have to jump from 2 to 4 days a week? Why not 3? Of course, some managers will be more flexible than others. Mine is okay, but I know some people whose managers allow no flexibility, yet you see those very same managers being granted flexibility to work remotely for multiple days to care for a sick parent, while their subordinates are told no for a single day.

Finally, there are some groups that are having a schedule forced on them, which really negates the flexibility. One group has a rotating schedule, which switches up their days from week to week, making it difficult to create a routine for childcare.

I really hope they lose some good people, and it makes them change their mind, like it did a few years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qf+1kt4jh80q

What a pile of complete nonsense .... here's one example form the diatribe "collaboration has become more difficult" So people working together IN PERSON in the same spaces has made collaboration more difficult ... this doesn't pass the laugh test.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1je+1kt4jh80q

unionize

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wm+1kt4jh80q

Post a reply

: