Thread regarding Citigroup Inc. / Citibank / Citi layoffs

Citi will always be technically behind so long as other banks (Wells F, JPM, PNC) are willing to pay more.

Oh sure, Citi pull out what they think is a big win by luring in some major director from other banks here and there. They make sure that hits the headlines but as you can see, they don’t stay very long.

Its a money shell game. These guys move from company to company for more money each time they move. They have no interest in making Citi a home.


by
| 31 views | | 13 replies (last 27 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1krdrw6vy

13 replies (most recent on top)

@ns as compared to what? American education? Man, kids don’t come back alive in American schools.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @q1+1krdrw6vy

doesn't matter who is a new manager if all the projects are designed and executed by the same teams in India with their very average education and lack of exposure to world class projects, systems ,etc

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ns+1krdrw6vy

Are developers using docker desktop there?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @md+1krdrw6vy

@gd

Exactly. Case in point.

Wells Fargo is a peer of Citi, whereas GS, JPMC, Bank of America, Morgan, Barclays are better banks Citi aspires to become.

Birds of a feather flock together and attract their own low caliber kind.

Citi's peers are Wells, BNY Mellon, State Street, Capital One Bank, HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, PNC Bank.

Citi canNOT afford to pay GS, JPMC salaries.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gj+1krdrw6vy

Wells Fargo paid me 💩. I got a jump here at Citi, to be honest.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gd+1krdrw6vy

When a "Manager" has 50% + of their employees/direct reports QUIT within a 12 month period, the problem is the "manager", NOT the employees.

Employees don't keep trying to fix the unfixable relationship. They Quit, give up, get a Divorce AND doNOT "Do Better".

This is Human Nature and Life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ez+1krdrw6vy

Anyone who says HR doesn't troll this Site is either HR, Legal/Compliance Dept. or a MD/Director.

They're the only Svckers patrolling Internet forums and gallantly defending Sh!ttybank's honour (IT has NONE!).

If the salaries are on par with GS, JPMC, Morgan, BofA etc. then why does Sh!ttybank only attract and retain low calibre employees who couldn't hack it or get hired by the former??

Companies are only as good as the employees they hire. High calibre, top perfomers go where they'll be paid most or best.

When the foundation is rotten, the whole building collapses and crumbles.

NO Other financial institution has the technological, operational and financial problems that Sh!ttybank has.

Ergo, Sh!ttybank pays DogSh!t compared to its envied Competitors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1krdrw6vy

Pay is average at best. The raises and bonus’s s*ck in comparison to the other banks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ev+1krdrw6vy

Tell me you’re not at all senior without telling me you aren’t senior. Citi is one of the best paying banks on the street- that’s part of the problem.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d5+1krdrw6vy

Citi actually pays well. I have worked for a couple of the big banks.

Bonuses and benefits are lacking though compared to others.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1krdrw6vy

My experience, pay is actually decent at Citi compared to other banks assuming you came in on the advanced side of pay scale. It’s literally the only reason I’m still here. As soon as something that pays materially more comes along, I’m out

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1krdrw6vy

I mean, I wouldn’t make Citi a home either.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1krdrw6vy

Money is one part, the other is the actual opportunity to enforce a change.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1krdrw6vy

Post a reply

: