Thread regarding BP PLC layoffs

bp North Sea Assets. When will be divest or decommission UK North Sea Assets?

BP is weighed down by North Sea UK assets. The hostile regulatory and taxation framework prevents meaningful investment and assets are entering a phase of operation that is not in BP’s wheelhouse. Meg will realize just like she did at Woodside that when assets reach a particular inflection point divestment even at a perceived loss creates a positive outcome for the company.

What assets need to be offloaded first? For transparency have BP UK sanctioned suspect projects with the intention of maintaining leverage and employment at the consequence of capital destruction?


by
| 21 views | | 11 replies (last 26 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kr8z1vpd

11 replies (most recent on top)

@19z They cant cancel it, too much money has been spent already to stop, and they have to hit the dates set by the govt. Plus its hugh ego and visibilty thing, the vp for projects in that region talks only about that project, anything else isnt of note to her. Too many favourites in her corridors

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ad+1kr8z1vpd

Kaskida project will be a great example of a project that shouldn't have been sanctioned but bp needs the reserves. The reservoir is viscous and salty. They need a subsea pump for it to flow. Drilling at such deep depths is risky and they want to do it for as cheap as possible. If this is such a great project, how come nobody has bought a minority interest. I heard unofficially that the project is delayed. I hope Meg has the insight to stop this project.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19z+1kr8z1vpd

lol we have sanctioned many things that were uneconomic. Job security, ego, pet projects, blind optimism… our portfolio is full of it. This is why no one will buy us

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @19g+1kr8z1vpd

@wd your very sure of your convictions. Many projects have been sanctioned and at the root level known at the sanction stage …that due to technical, political risk, or partner issue were value destructive. This exists at small project to the mega project level…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x6+1kr8z1vpd

This is the most under-educated(sic) question I've ever seen on this site.

Do you genuinely believe that the UK business would sanction investment just so they keep people employed?

Do you have any idea how capital governance works and the approval hierarchy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wd+1kr8z1vpd

Reading to mood music

NS span off into JV arrangement. Non operated.
Central functions reduced by 30-50% (specifically Sunbury and Houston)
Green energy dismantled
Brazil to be operated by others

Regional led businesses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @j9+1kr8z1vpd

Expect Apache to go bankrupt soon and offload the Forties field back on bp lap…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1kr8z1vpd

@af so transcendental. BP needs to pivot…if not then things get challenging

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kr8z1vpd

BP will leave the uk and we will all leave BP... its the circle of life ...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kr8z1vpd

BP got that Whitehall will take a pound of flesh…change corporate domicile asap. UK is doomed…BP will try …I know better than you…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1kr8z1vpd

Divest if you will, but don't think Whitehall will forget it. What the taxman doesn't get, the courts will.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kr8z1vpd

Post a reply

: