Thread regarding Broadcom Corp. layoffs

Is ESG management going against company policy?

A lot of office workers in India and the U.S. have been laid off recently.

But somehow there are still plenty of remote workers sitting in Dublin, Ireland. Why is ESG management holding onto them? What kind of justification is being made for keeping these roles?

From what I can see, most of them don’t bring anything special to the table. I’m not seeing strong skills in areas like reverse engineering or development. Honestly, it feels like teams in India or the U.S. could take over that work and do it better.

So what’s really going on here? Is ESG management going against company policy? Or do these people have connections with upper management? A lot of them seem to be legacy folks from the old Symantec days.


by
| 1 view | | 3 replies (last 29 days ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knqpy45g

3 replies (most recent on top)

Fũck Hock

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @55n+1knqpy45g

It is same here in Ontario, Canada. They keep remote workers with connections within the company who aren't even legacy. It su-ks! One who knows how to gaslight things and su-k to the management are there and many great employees did silence quit or are laid off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @50w+1knqpy45g

Wow, Legacy Symantec remote workers. You know what happened to legacy remote CB workers? Either laid offf or forced back into the office, and that happened right after the merger. I can’t imagine legacy remote workers lasting this long.

If Jas*n is aware of this, he is so harsh on CB guys.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1knqpy45g

Post a reply

: