Thread regarding Synopsys Inc. layoffs

Wondering how individuals were picked for the RIF list

Has any else heard those skip-managers saying that they pretended that they aren't aware of names before the RIF event. How can someone in HR completely segmented from the department in a large company make decisions about the individuals in their reporting structure without consulting that skip-manager for a list. They already have been made the list individuals that they can let go and still function in the months before these RIF events. In today's world, no decision is made on the roll of a dice or in a vacuum.

Why cannot managers or directors own up the their decisions and state you're too expensive to move forward and we have to let you go instead of making up this silly story about "they didn't make this list"???? Letting experienced employees go that have attempted to build a career with the company for loyalty ( or good team ) reasons instead of job hoping to build your salary requirements is a sad culture to be in for sure!

They still have a well paying job, getting a raise and RSUs moving forward for trimming the fat so own it.

Am I the only one that thinks this way?


by
| 11 views | | 8 replies (last April 11) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knm1d37d

8 replies (most recent on top)

@s0

R&D has been tracking everyone’s lines of code, and honestly, it looks like that number was used in the layoffs. It’s a terrible signal — because now I’m watching teammates churn out pointless refactors just to avoid being labeled “low output.” When people fear being cut, they stop building value and start padding numbers. That’s not productivity; that’s panic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sy+1knm1d37d

@OP in our team , the guy who raised the least jiras got laid off (tpg) , literal r**ard for a manager we have

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @s0+1knm1d37d

@OP Thanks for the great advice! I've heard rumors that the next round might be in May or June. Since that's only a month or two away if true, I'm thinking of taking a chance and setting the start date for late July. That's why I posted here to validate the dates. But you're right—they might retract the offer, and I'd end up with nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mt+1knm1d37d

@bp Of course, their favorites all remained on the team regardless of their performance, and it’s true that those who were disliked by the Skip Manager and their direct supervisors—even if they were delivering results—were let go. At least, that was the case during the first round of layoffs in Japan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ms+1knm1d37d

One simple way to check if the RIF list was recommended by your skip managers is to see if any of their favorites were in the list.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bp+1knm1d37d

Because managers are low life sc-m with absolutely zero self respect.
Sc--w them at every opportunity you get. I wish nothing but sorrow, hardship and pestilence on upper management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1knm1d37d

While the RIF list in my unit includes a diverse range of ages, a colleague noted that his department’s layoffs primarily affected older employees. This discrepancy suggests a potential pattern of age discrimination.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1knm1d37d

The point of HR is to protect the company. Telling someone they are too expensive is opening the company to litigation, especially in the United States , where age discrimination for those older than 40 is against the law

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1knm1d37d

Post a reply

: