Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

At what stock price will the naysayers admit that Dan was the right choice for us?

Dan gets a lot of flac for his cutting, but this company is like a terminally ill patient that needs an infestation of tumors removed. At some point he will have the stock at a proper value.


by
| 2321 views | | 31 replies (last March 2) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kjh92s73

31 replies (most recent on top)

Onion strong!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nz+1kjh92s73

@gd Well if that happens, then there won’t be anyone left to do the work except AI and humanoid robots.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ns+1kjh92s73

Don't worry about Dan he will be well compensated for doing his magic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nh+1kjh92s73

@gd exactly so though $75 per share is enough for Dan to trouser $200+ million

The SEC filing stated the reference price is based on the 20-day average closing price ending on October 17, 2025. If we run the exact math using $42.00 as the reference price:

Make-Whole RSUs: ($9.5M ÷ $42) = 226,190 shares × $75 = $16,964,250
Standard RSUs: ($20M ÷ $42) = 476,190 shares × $75 = $35,714,250
Standard PSUs: ($30M ÷ $42) = 714,285 shares. At 200% max payout = 1,428,570 shares × $75 = $107,142,750
Supplemental PSUs: 666,666 max shares × $75 = $49,999,950

Total: $16.96M + $35.71M + $107.14M + $50M = $209.81 million

  • his salary is not included
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hv+1kjh92s73

@d7 What if Dan lays off the remaining 45k management employees? If 15k management employees equals a $10 per share increase, then 45k management employees would equal a $30 per share increase. VZ would be an $80 stock then. That’s how that works, right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gd+1kjh92s73

@OP Good raise, 100% STI. The stock price the highest in a long time. The highest stock payout since started and little less fat. Win Win

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g2+1kjh92s73

@bk um, it's already at $50

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g0+1kjh92s73

@dy hah, when you're cutting 15000 people globally they're not looking at whether they voluntarily rocked up to the office a couple of times or not. It's pure lottery at that stage with maybe a sprinkle of ageism/strategy around cost benefit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1kjh92s73

Idk I get better returns from being employed than I do from Verizon stock. Otherwise, you’d need $1.5M in VZ stock to turn $100K a year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1kjh92s73

@e0 The buyback program is actually $25 billion according to what Skiadas presented at Barclays

https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/verizon-at-barclays-symposium-strategic-transformation-and-financial-outlook-93CH-4521559

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e2+1kjh92s73

@d7 "He laid off 15000 managers" - FALSE

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1kjh92s73

@d7 It was mentioned here before, are you so ignorant? He inflated the stock price by laying off employees and will lay off more, then the CFO promised $20B stock buyback over 3 years (so $20B into shareholders' pockets) and cutting CAPEX and OPEX (Frontier, AI, blabla). At the same, VZ incurred more debt to pay off the severances.

  • CEO's contract includes:*
    Base Salary: $1,500,000 per year.
    Short-Term Incentive (Cash Bonus): Target of 250% of base salary ($3,750,000).
    Long-Term Incentives:
    $20 million in RSUs: Vests on December 31, 2027.
    $30 million in PSUs: Vests based on Verizon's Total Shareholder Return (TSR) relative to a peer group (payout 0–200%).

Make-Whole Grant: $9.5 million in RSUs to compensate for forfeited pay from his previous firm.

  • Summary of Payout:* If Schulman successfully drives the stock price to $75.00 and maintains it for 20 days, the supplemental grant alone would be worth approximately $50 million (666,666 shares × $75), in addition to his other $50M+ in standard equity and salary.

The Hatchet man is there to fill his pockets and doesn't care one iota about the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e0+1kjh92s73

I have several longtime coworkers who had the mindset that the not going in home based gig was the ultimate get over. Most were laughing the last several years about it. I was always a bit leary of it as it seemed to good to be true. I made it a point to make an appropriate number of appearances to be safe. I guess it worked out as I am still here and they got "Danned". I feel bad for some of them but you got to admit many of us have been getting the better of this place for some time. A few didn't care to much as a push out is all they needed to move on to retirement. This place is still filled with similar placeholders. I still don't feel safe here but will try my best not to get the boot. Hopefully when Dan has completed his task it will be an improved place to work as well a strong stock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dy+1kjh92s73

He laid off 15000 managers and the stock went up $10 a share. Im pretty sure he will offer an EISP to as many union members will take it. Then lay off more managers. Then the price will go up $10 more. He will figure out how to get the work done after the stock hits $60.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d7+1kjh92s73

@OP Dan the hatchet man used his magical AI machine for the 13k+ layoffs. As one of them I’ll say I wasn’t a tumor. No disrespect to anyone but there are tumors that remain while the good tissue was cut out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d5+1kjh92s73

All those eliminated had it coming. The only injustice is there are still more many more in need of a purge left. They may laugh right now but their day is coming. It seems no one else was willing to facilitate the needed cleanse, so Dan now finally gets the freedom to do so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1kjh92s73

I say 65 stock price and at least another 10k less employees. I think he can accomplish this. Yes he was on the board prior but they obviously did not listen to him. It appears they have finally allowed him the freedom to do the necessary. People tend to hate on the ones issuing badly needed medicine, so the hate is understandable. We have suffered too long. When he is through this will be a much better place with a real future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ca+1kjh92s73

No matter what he still isn't the right person. Fools gold. Time will expose him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c4+1kjh92s73

Q4 disconnect reporting? Something definitely looked off on q4 results? It wouldn’t surprise me if not reporting a portion of disconnects took place but that is a serious claim that would bring a massive black eye to our stock. Any proof?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1kjh92s73

At what price?

15,000 jobs eliminated

$40M buyout to fail CEO and Consumer President. Hans/Sampath

$15B buyback

Postpone disconnect reporting

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c2+1kjh92s73

@OP SAD

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bz+1kjh92s73

It’s at 50 now, I’d say 60

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bn+1kjh92s73

All large cap value stocks are up and tech is down. Dan said he needs 3 to 4 years,

“75” is the magic number

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1kjh92s73

$50, I will scream dan is the man at $50

I think we see 20 before that, but lets watch

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1kjh92s73

are you stu pid or what ?
it's a buyback program financed by laying off 15000 that is driving the stock ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1kjh92s73

@OP He was part of the board with the many years of poor leadership. Now that he's axing everything he deserves an award?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1kjh92s73

Haven’t you noticed the stock price of Verizon’s competitors have all risen too in the past month?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kjh92s73

We’ve had one decent quarter and the rise in stock price is all about market sentiment…not based on any miraculous transformation. It’s way too early to say how things will go

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1kjh92s73

Let’s see multiple quarters of sustained growth and increased stock price w/o the need of a massive layoff.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kjh92s73

He was on the board the whole time Hans was steering the ship off course. He is an opportunist not a savior . What he is orchestrating is for his short term benefit not Verizon’s long term future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b5+1kjh92s73

He has done more to improve things than Hans ever did. I would call that successful.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1kjh92s73

Post a reply

: