Thread regarding Shell Oil layoffs

Shell failing promises as it seeks exit from PA

Story by Danielle Smith

Shell is reportedly struggling to recoup its massive investment in Pennsylvania’s petrochemical sector, with weak fourth-quarter returns renewing concerns the project has underdelivered on jobs, growth and profits.

The company is seeking a buyer or partner for its Shell Polymers Monaca plant and may never fully recover its $14 billion investment in the venture, according to a report from the Ohio River Valley Institute.

Kathy Hipple, research fellow at the institute and the report's co-author, said data show Shell received a major state tax subsidy intended to build a regional petrochemical hub. The company has already collected about $90 million and could keep receiving roughly $60 million to $65 million a year if the company continues to purchase and process more than a billion gallons of ethane annually.

She pointed out Shell has begun to sell off tax credits intended to support the local petrochemical industry.

"By law, they are able to sell these tax credits," Hipple acknowledged. "So far, they seem to have sold 100% of the tax credits that they have received to other companies that are not in the manufacturing industry. They're usually in the insurance industry. Sometimes they're not even in the region."

Hipple noted the Pennsylvania Resource Manufacturing Tax Credit’s “lookback provision,” set to trigger in 2028, could allow legislators to reevaluate the flow of tax credits to Shell Polymers Monaca. Lawmakers can assess whether the facility has met its original objectives and if it has not, consider modifying the incentive.

Anne Keller, also at the institute, said the state’s tax credit structure was unusually generous. The program effectively gave Shell a five‑cent discount on every gallon of ethane feedstock the plant uses. She spoke with an industry analyst who explained lawmakers initially discussed capping the subsidy at 30,000 barrels per day but the limit never made it into the final legislation.

"The bottom line was that the plant use it, and that is a very, very significant discount for a plant like this," Keller emphasized. "These are big commodity manufacturing facilities and feedstock is one of the critical cost elements that allows them to be profitable."

The report stated Shell has not fulfilled its commitments for job creation or local economic development. Since the 2012 announcement of its ethane cr--ker project, Beaver County’s GDP has fallen 12%, the local population has dropped by 3%, and employment has declined more than 13%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/shell-failing-promises-as-it-seeks-exit-from-pa


by
| 1751 views | | 12 replies (last March 6) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1khp2hdsq

12 replies (most recent on top)

@2pm the last few big major projects (PennChem and Prelude) were riddled with cost overruns and operational start up issues.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qw+1khp2hdsq

What caused Monaca to fail?

I think the premise was that cheap feedstock from Appalachian gas fields and low energy costs would lead to competitive advantage.

Was the premise wrong or did something else go wrong - China dumping, cost overruns, or something else?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2pm+1khp2hdsq

Here is another one
Divesting $3B from Woodside NWS LNG. In 2023 Shell sold its 27% interest in Browse gas field to BP ... any guesses where YL will put this money?

https://www.upstreamonline.com/finance/shell-in-talks-over-potential-3-billion-lng-divestment/2-1-1949609?lid=qiu5o1j6819w&up-daily-newsletter%3Futm_source=newsletter&utm_campaign=2026-02-26&utm_content=up-daily-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=braze_epost&utm_term=braze_epost

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1j5+1khp2hdsq

Everything at Shell has always been for sale. The only issue is that the price isn't agreed upon.

And what would they do with the proceeds, that's clear too; they buy Shell shares for cancelation. Then downsize employees. There's nothing inherently evil or nefarious, but there isn't any part of that that is looking to a future that builds returns better than below average.

There, that's $10 mln worth of leadership. It would be better if they could bundle poorer returning assets with the good stuff but they never seem to do that. Or if they sold only underperforming assets that'd be great too! And even if they sell the good assets, I wish that they would ask better prices.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qh+1khp2hdsq

Don't forget LNG Canada!
$15B, up for sale
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/shell-mitsubishi-exploring-sale-options-their-stakes-lng-canada-sources-say-2026-01-16/

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f7+1khp2hdsq

my body is ready for us to sell it for chump change

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eg+1khp2hdsq

@e8 I think Prelude was also over $15B and has had a bunch of operational issues as well. Those 2 projects alone hurt Shell.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eb+1khp2hdsq

14 billion to build a steam cr--ker and a polymers plant? That’s embarrassing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e8+1khp2hdsq

I blame BVB. dutch pr--k

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1khp2hdsq

Yeah, all those godda-n people we were supposed to hire. Employees su-k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1khp2hdsq

Sukks to be shell.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1khp2hdsq

What a joke project!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1khp2hdsq

Post a reply

: