So after 70 years we’re ending this? Does it have any relation to when BL manipulated it completely to set a business case for reinvent? Or is it because that business case has now proven to be completely flawed……
9 replies (most recent on top)
I’d imagine they swan off to some corporate hedonism resort with the the trans crew.
it makes sense. science and technical data are rayciss. and bP biz is about wokeness so dont need to publish that.
Wow interesting! What are the well known issues???
BP is a terrible company and place to work. For the last 10 years this company has been about one thing and only one thing. BLs narcissistic drive to become some saint figure. Others around him have towed the line in return for $$$ and a blind eye to certain well known issues.
3sko+1ke0zr50 what exactly are you doing on here???
This is a site to discuss bp without the oversight of yammer and the retaliation of opentalk.
BP as a company does not foster feedback other than positive affirmation
Why don’t you all speak your feelings on Yammer or opentalk instead of sulking here? Seems pretty cowardly sorry
UK government really does not like bp these days. Took a sh1t ton of windfall tax and now says hydrogen is going nowhere. Don’t worry BL I’m sure your knighthood is in the post.
It’ll be replaced by bps woke review of the year, where we will publish stats such as needless roles created to promote D&I. Number of pointless processes to ensure agile happens. Total shareholder value decreased by over paying for renewable projects. Execs dismissed for inappropriate behavior. Etc
This makes no sense for me. It is a great example of soft power that opens the door for us to engage with nations. Those are Spencer's words not mine. I'm looking to leave as I genuinely believe the company is going to the dogs and I don't want any part of it