What's Happening ...to stock prices..>>>>>>its getting brutal----->0.9 * Skyworks stock price plus $32 equals q share buyout. they might even revise that, even lower, its like a bad luck charm. The Q can mess things up worse without even trying. Its just one big "Glitch"; but have no fear, Skyworks will " Fix The Glitch"
10 replies (most recent on top)
You guys are re--rded and it’s funny af that you try to use ai to sound smart
@ec Liking your own post, across multiple replies, is a terrible way to go through life.
@ea Yes,
Qorvo is a leader in gallium nitride (GaN) technology and continues to develop, manufacture, and sell a broad portfolio of GaN-based products for a variety of applications.
Qorvo leverages its GaN-on-silicon carbide (SiC) technology for high-power, high-efficiency solutions in key markets, including:
Defense & Aerospace: Qorvo is a "Trusted Source" supplier for the U.S. Department of Defense and provides GaN solutions for radar, electronic warfare (EW), and satellite communications (SATCOM) systems.
5G and Communications: GaN is critical for 5G infrastructure, where it enables high power and high frequency performance in base stations and other networking equipment.
Power Management: Qorvo is involved in power conversion and motor control solutions, partnering with companies like Cambridge GaN Devices to integrate GaN for increased power density and efficiency in applications like home appliances.
Cable TV (CATV): GaN has been instrumental in enabling faster network speeds through standards like DOCSIS 3.1.
Foundry Services: Qorvo offers its advanced GaN foundry services to third parti
@ea yeah you guys are just sc--wed....shoudlnt have stayed there..you wasted your career Qorn-ole employment, a good place for sub performers to hide
@dk AFAIK a bunch of GaN people were let go from Qorvo a while back, so nothing to write home about from that front.
The fruit company : as the largest customer for both Qorn-ole and Skyworks: loathes supplier concentration. Their entire supply chain strategy is built on having at least two qualified suppliers for every critical component. This ensures:
1) Price Leverage: Suppliers are constantly competing on cost.
2) Supply Security: A disruption at one factory (natural disaster, operational issue) does
not halt fruit phone production.
The merger significantly reduces competition and puts the newly formed $22 billion entity in a much stronger position to negotiate. This leverage will be intolerable to the fruit company( the company which must not be named)
The Second Sources and Their Opportunity
The merger is a gift to the existing major RF players the fruit company's most strategically competing second sources, which would now be ( Broadcom( FBAR), Murata (SAW BAW), Qualcom (ki-ler chipset).
Lest we forget "Fruit Company In House" They have successfully demonstrated the ability to solve their own supplier issues by doing it themselves. Give some thought to how they accomplish this.
There is one more item to consider, the fruit phone has had its day in the sun, we will see its replacement soon, and it won't be a phone as we know it. More likely the equivalent of a dummy terminal with an AI controlled Cloud processor for the customer. Everyone will be in competition, because the mobile phone as we know it, will be no more, That's not a prediction that's prophecy.
The Dynamics of this Matrix are going to radically change in the next six months.
@d7 " Was this liability figured into company valuation for sale?" There is not going to be a sale Watch the stocks tank. There will be a spinoff of most related GaN activites with exception of quality related support, which is not needed , and the rest, well your guess is as good as mine. That spin off is tax free for starboard ( U.S. Internal Revenue Code (IRC), primarily Section 355) and unlocks the path to sale of sum of parts. Which is really the end game goal, hence the two year waiting period for sale.
Right now there is a merger spread, and the shareholders, well they aren't going for that.
As far as a sale goes, you would have an entity with over 50% proforma income coming in from the fruit company, besides product cycles, that fruit company has pricing power. Any educated shareholder knows this. So dont worry about the sale.
Qorn-ole just about says it all!
A bit wordy here but stay with me till the end.
The US Department of Labor (DOL) sued Pennsylvania-based East Penn Manufacturing Company – which makes and recycles lead-acid batteries – under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The company allegedly failed to pay employees for all time spent changing and showering before and after shifts.
Here are the relevant facts regarding labor compliance:
• Workers need to change into protective uniforms and don special gear before their shifts since their work involves hazardous materials. They also need to take a shower when their shift is over.
• East Penn didn’t record how much time workers actually spent changing and showering for purposes of paying them. Instead, the company paid employees by granting them a five-minute grace period at the start of their shift, and a 10-minute post-shift grace period.
After a trial, a jury found that East Penn shorted the pay of over 11,000 workers and awarded roughly $22.25 million in backpay.
The manufacturer argued that federal courts are split on the proper legal standard and wanted the Supreme Court to step in to resolve the dispute, but SCOTUS declined to review the case on November 10. As a result, the 3rd Circuit’s decision stands, and the employer is liable for the multi-million-dollar award.
The East Penn case sets clear judicial guidance on fair wage practices, especially where regulatory compliance connects to worker safety, and strengthens workers’ rights to compensation for all required work activities
Precedent no longer allows employers to pay only for a reasonable amount of time, so workers weren’t paid for just walking around and “loafing” between job activities. Instead, the appeals court said East Penn could discipline or terminate employees for slacking on the job but not withhold their compensation. Employer's must review all required tasks employees perform before and after their shifts to ensure they’re properly paid.
An employer defense would be "De minimis". This applies to employee benefits that are so small they are not considered taxable compensation. Businesses may not be penalized for minor infractions that fall below a certain regulatory threshold.
It is not legal for an employer to require you to clock in early in exchange for a paid 30-minute lunch break; this is likely an illegal "kickback" or a form of requiring you to work without pay. Since federal law does not require paid lunch breaks, if your employer grants one, it must be a minimum of 30 minutes, during which you are not required to work, and you must not be compensated for the unpaid portion.
Key takeaways
• Pay for all hours worked: Your employer must pay you for all time spent working, even if you are "voluntarily" working during your break.
• Unpaid breaks: A meal period of 30 minutes or more is generally unpaid, as long as you are completely relieved of all job duties.
• No "kickbacks": Forcing employees to clock in early in exchange for a paid lunch break is illegal because it is a form of requiring unpaid work.
Key implications for the semiconductor industry
• Pay for all "hours worked": Semiconductor workers must be paid for the actual time it takes to put on and take off required safety gear, which can be an integral part of their principal activities in a cleanroom environment.
• Accurate time tracking: The verdict means companies can't use arbitrary "grace periods" or estimates for tasks like changing, showering, or other safety-related activities. Accurate time-tracking systems must be used to ensure employees are paid for the full duration.
• Proactive compliance: Companies should proactively audit their processes to identify all activities that could be considered "working time" and ensure they are compliant with wage and hour laws, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
• Potential for overtime liability: The impact of not paying for these activities can be compounded by overtime calculations, potentially leading to significant liability for companies with numerous employees.
So, how many times did you have to clock in prior to shift start only to see if rounded down (no pay); even though your presence at your work station was mandatory?
Was this liability figured into company valuation for sale?
• If liability is established (as in the East Penn verdict), it must be subtracted from the company’s valuation for sale or acquisition purposes—otherwise, buyers could find themselves on the hook for millions in surprise losses.
The Qorvo-Skyworks merger announcement initiates a critical two-year regulatory closing period (until early 2027). During this vacuum, it is possible that competitors will be launching an aggressive poaching campaign to disrupt the combined entity and acquire specialized Qorvo talent.
Key Risks & Synergy Targets:
The combined entity is targeting $500 million in annual cost synergies, which necessitates identifying redundant roles. Your stability is uncertain, and your expertise is highly sought after by rivals like Wolfspeed, Broadcom, and Defense Primes.
Niche Expertise is the Immediate Target
If your expertise falls into these non-overlapping, high-value Qorvo segments, you are currently the most sought-after talent:
Gallium Nitride (GaN) R&D/Fab: High-power, military-grade semiconductor leadership.
High-End Filter Design: Specialized SAW/BAW technology for 5G/6G multiplexers.
Defense & Aerospace (Broad Markets): Established IP and customer relationships in specialized military communications and radar.
Immediate Call to Action (The Next 12 Months)
Map Your Value: Identify 2-3 technical skills that are non-redundant with core Skyworks capabilities.
Assess Market: Discreetly confirm your market value with external competitors in your specialty area.
Be Indispensable: Prioritize deliverables in Qorvo’s unique IP areas (especially GaN and Defense) to be essential during the final integration decisions.
Defensive Structuring
The structure of the deal—using a large, fixed cash component and a floating stock component—was a shrewd, defensive move. Actually Finance 101
It ensured the Qorvo board would accept the deal by giving them an immediate, high-premium cash payout.
It gave Skyworks the ability to complete the purchase knowing that their stock would likely drop, while preserving some capital by using their own shares as currency.
they priced the deal to offer a high, guaranteed value at the announcement while structurally anticipating the negative market reaction that has since played out.