Thread regarding SAP layoffs

Too much going wrong with SAP

I had been lurking on this site for a while and decided to post today because I couldn't handle it any longer.

As a long-term SAP employee, I can no longer identify with the organization. We've always had reorganizations and layoffs, but I've never seen the Board and HR be so anti-employee and put employees against one another.

Here are some trends I am noticing:

There is no MOVE SAP for T1-T3 personnel.
Annual salary appraisals are not even close to inflation, thus we lose money each year.
HR-focused managers instead of development managers.
Hiring freeze.
Travel freeze.
Rumors regarding closing locations other than Walldorf and St Leon Rot.
Replacement positions only in low-cost areas.
Anti-migrant sentiment.
Board compensation increasing dramatically each year.
Almost every German employment is offered solely in Walldorf and St Leon Rot.
Performance management is a reasonable approach to pay employees less.
No more catalyst or comparable schemes.
AI-first strategy, but showing no business development.
Organizational restructuring, such as HPOM, is built on influencer propaganda.
The stock price has plummeted.
Board says regular layoffs are non-negotiable without giving a good reason.
Stupid AI replacing important support, QA, IT and development functions instead of HR.
Employees coerced into giving their managers spectacular unfiltered reviews or forego salary increments.
Share buybacks.
Budget available for executive travel and entertainment but not development.
Stupid online courses instead of career focused learning by human experts.
Legal troubles.
Acquisition after acquisition without integration of acquired employees.
Only the same people getting the big jobs and promotions everywhere at SAP while others haven't found a new position in years.
You have to be a balding German white male based near Heidelberg to land a good management position.
Anti-women sentiment.
Executives openly making derogatory statements without any consequences - equating life altering career changes to brushing teeth.
CEO having no foresight or long-term plan to improve company and instead blatantly lying about things like "we'll create new 15000 positions in India" only to follow with layoffs everywhere.
Managers given so much power that it is more important to keep your managers happy than your customers happy.
Reduction in benefits.
Anti Muslim sentiment.
Week long party budget in some areas (Signavio) while other areas suffer and don't even have budget to hire development consultants.
Too many HR employees who in turn say we have too many QAs, developers, product managers, designers, etc.
Fake career progression plans as the only way to grow is to find another job.
Too many "innovation teams" that create stuff shown at Sapphire but it never makes it into production.

I can go on and on but this is already a long list.

What do you think? Do you share a similar sentiment? Do you agree or disagree with any of the items listed here? Having a good stable job without politicking seems almost hopeless at SAP.

In the past, points like these were enough to fire board members. But now the transfer of wealth and power from employees to executives is normalized. What can employees do to get back power and ensure a stable career at SAP?


by
| 5361 views | | 26 replies (last January 11) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ka0rpcyq

26 replies (most recent on top)

CoE is dead :(

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @8h7+1ka0rpcyq

Nothing is wrong with SAP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @x6+1ka0rpcyq

@wc The entire market is down, all the anaylists have it as a buy or hold and all have an expectation of 50% growth but everything is going in the opposite direction. That's because the stock market is just a betting market by a lot of flighty people with very limited knowledge and has zero to do with the real world and the sooner we stop caring about the secondary trading markets for things the better the world will be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wd+1ka0rpcyq

@OP what's going on with SAP share price this week ?

It's a free fall !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wc+1ka0rpcyq

@jz There is another option, become a HRBP then be promoted to Tech Manager.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vv+1ka0rpcyq

If all the HRBPs are flying to Waldorf, and there is an employee all hands the first week of December that was just announced, that can only mean mass layoffs to be announced. Last ditch effort to goose the stock price. Some people speculate that it is a big acquisition, but SAP would not stop every employee from working for an hour to announce an acquisition !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qx+1ka0rpcyq

@jn read this book 2 or 3 times
https://a.co/d/bH9jyft

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n4+1ka0rpcyq

@mr mistake in this post, it was meant for the id--t that keeps posting about trust in the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ms+1ka0rpcyq

@jn you are an id--t just for posting this.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mr+1ka0rpcyq

@OP and a Bravo to you. This is exactly what is happening and been happening for years, we just see it more because of the change of CEO and his rookie mistakes.

It’s shameful and terrible. Worst part the change of leadership and the no-progress in your career and the BS they feed you.

I reported to 13 managers in 15 years, my career went nowhere despite the hard work.

In other companies they offer you RSU’s.

Unfortunately the maker is terrible in terms of talent and hiring.

The good news. Save your energy and save your money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mq+1ka0rpcyq

@ky well, you’ll see the anti Indian and anti Muslim sentiment even here on this site. And it has gotten worse with time. The post after this one was clearly created to increase this anti Indian sentiment.

But the white men part actually made me chuckle. I just took a look at all managers in my board area and 77% of them fill the criteria mentioned in the post. And I could add another 8% to that if “balding” wasn’t a criteria.

I don’t take offense with the OP statement and neither should you. After all, our HQ and main offices are based near Heidelberg and SAP has a long history of hiring from nearby universities. SAP also has a lower immigrant to Europeans ratio compared to other companies so you’ll rarely see immigrants in good management positions. But what bothers me is that we don’t give enough opportunities for women to grow in management positions. Maybe we can encourage and help women to grow their career at SAP? That’s my takeaway.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m1+1ka0rpcyq

"anti muslim"
"anti women"
"anti migrant"
proceeds to complain about white men.

discrimination is only okay if it is the discrimination that you accept. what an awful person.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ky+1ka0rpcyq

I agree with most of what you have written - although I’ve personally never observed an anti-immigrant or anti-Muslim sentiment. For other posters, yes - locations are closing or have been closed - just look at Palo Alto. When DA arrived he announced that SAP was run for the benefit of the employees and now it will be run for the benefit of the shareholders. For a while, layoffs were enough to raise the share price but even that strategy seems not to be sufficient to stop the share price slide. Nevertheless, they will double down on layoffs because SAP is not in growth mode, it’s in cost control/reduce overhead mode and other than leases, employees/benefits are the biggest cost. All companies rise and fall - SAP is on the decline, the execs know it and are extracting maximum personal benefit before it’s too late. You can go down with the Titanic, or find a lifeboat before it’s too late.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k5+1ka0rpcyq

@OP as a long term employee myself (+20 years) I think we developed this sentiment of belonging and attachment to SAP. Now we are upset because the feelings weren't shared by the company and we understood that we are just numbers and we are managed by threat to be fired/replaced by an AI agent.

This reminds me of the movie title "No country for old men" which we can safely say that there's no software place for us "old men" in this software industry and we need to setup a way out plan either by accepting a package after restructuring or investing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jz+1ka0rpcyq

@gn “ In moments like these, it’s fair to question whether such travel is truly necessary. Could these costs have supported a few more roles or extended employment for impacted staff? Many of us on the engineering side feel the weight of these decisions deeply we continue to build and innovate while wondering. We engineers are building the company and the HR and the support functions are enjoying it.”

The board and executives at SAP believe that all developers can eventually be replaced with AI. So what’s the use trying to invest in them anyway? HR colleagues are important in the short term because they will help quell the controversies around layoffs and take care of any engineers who oppose this change. But before coming for engineers, they’re coming for other support staff such as support engineers, designers, product owners, QA engineers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jb+1ka0rpcyq

It’s disheartening to see the direction SAP is heading. Having been part of this company for so long, it’s painful to witness the current layoffs and the uncertainty many colleagues are facing. At the same time, I’ve learned that HRBPs from across the globe are flying to Germany for a week-long in-person meeting which could easily cost around 200k$
In moments like these, it’s fair to question whether such travel is truly necessary. Could these costs have supported a few more roles or extended employment for impacted staff? Many of us on the engineering side feel the weight of these decisions deeply we continue to build and innovate while wondering. We engineers are building the company and the HR and the support functions are enjoying it. Does board leaders have become so week to not even as these questions to HR Leader and the CFO who is making these hasty decisions
I hope leadership reflects on these choices with transparency, empathy, and financial prudence. Strong, people-first decision-making is more important now than ever.
Do the board leaders have become so week to not even as these questions to HR Leader and the CFO who is making these hasty decisions?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gn+1ka0rpcyq

@dj they used to be known as "people leads," and for many of them, Signavio was their first job in tech. Aside from coaching on DEI and HR matters, all other work was managed by tech leads. The management at Signavio aimed to transition these people leads into HR roles and elevate the tech leads to development managers. However, SAP integration team and HR pushed back, arguing that for a smooth integration into SAP, the engineering management at Signavio should be replaced with SAP staff. As a result, most of Signavio's management departed. And these former people leads have taken on the role of development managers. They’re participating in a few "curated" online training sessions for three months to enhance their technical skills to match those of T4 development experts and architects. Since their backgrounds closely resemble those of HR colleagues, this has created an opportunity for HR staff to step into development manager positions.

The individuals who attempted to resist this shift either "quit" Signavio or, in some instances, were also assigned development manager positions under HPOM.

The current Signavio management doesn’t want this information shared with other SAP areas. That’s why you’ll see so much spam on posts where this topic and Signavio are mentioned.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gm+1ka0rpcyq

Six seven?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @en+1ka0rpcyq

It is ridiculous to have HR manage the tech team... that is why in Germany we have 300+ HRBP?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1ka0rpcyq

@am I don’t think OP should do that. Even if you post anonymously, the user ID of any message can still be traced. There is a failsafe built in to catch anyone who could paste illegal content and it wouldn’t be hard for a board member to find out who posted this.

The only reasonable way this can be brought to the all hands is by an employee who’s already on their way out or by a member of the Works Council on behalf of the OP.

Don’t rely on unfiltered comments or “anonymous” messages. They have enough data markers associated with them to find out who posted it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @az+1ka0rpcyq

OP you should post this exact message in the employee all hands

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1ka0rpcyq

@a4 not sure if unionizing would help. With every additional layoff, the total number of SAP employees goes down and so does the total number of Works Council members, Supervisory Board members, union leaders, etc.

I wonder if there is a way to work together with management than against them. I don't have a solution but I see the problems OP mentioned.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1ka0rpcyq

@a5 Are the location closing down? We don't know and OP never said that.
But are there rumors? Yes, at least in the Berlin office saying they want to close that down and only keep the Potsdam one as it is cheaper.

Your reply is a textbook example of criticism without adding to the conversation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1ka0rpcyq

Rumors regarding closing locations other than Walldorf and St Leon Rot. What is the source? Trust me bro?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1ka0rpcyq

@OP I share some of your criticisms.

What can we do?

Maybe unionizing to a larger degree than today would be an option.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1ka0rpcyq

Six seven

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1ka0rpcyq

Post a reply

: