Thread regarding Phillips 66 layoffs

Prized possession - People

How many of you are happy you voted for Elliott now?


by
| 2121 views | | 10 replies (last October 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k7bdp5bb

10 replies (most recent on top)

@jf Citgo assets are getting auctioned and that approval is still months in the making. In addition, Amber Energy, the Elliott affiliate and real reason why Elliott is hounding us is the only slim possibility. No merger, mire likely P66 will buy into Citgo assets from Amber Energy, therby appeasing Elliott. Know your sh-t before spreading bullsh-t rumors

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mk+1k7bdp5bb

@h6 I heard it from reputable sources. It will be a super merger. Coming by end of December.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jf+1k7bdp5bb

@dz where did you hear that? You mean a massive merger or a buy out?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h6+1k7bdp5bb

Elliott didn’t “win” and they were only really concerned about “reliability”, right? Isn’t that how the ELT decided to spin the outcome of the vote? All decisions at the ELT level being made are to integrate midstream into refining so much that it would be too complex to separate, to protect the ELT. Don’t get it twisted the ELT is out to protect #1.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g9+1k7bdp5bb

I’ve read that Elliot will push a super deal with Citgo

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1k7bdp5bb

Thank God for Elliott! Or we would be bankrupt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d2+1k7bdp5bb

It wasn’t as easy or as much fun as I thought it would be but I voted with Elliott and will do so if given the opportunity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1k7bdp5bb

I am and plan to again. Elliott is not responsible for any of the changes you might be complaining about.

Your issues lie with the management team of PSX.

Yes, I will vote for Elliott again and I will be voting to exit this weak and insufferable management team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bn+1k7bdp5bb

How many people that just throws them away in the trash?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1k7bdp5bb

What?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1k7bdp5bb

Post a reply

: