Thread regarding IBM layoffs

SHOULD WE SCORE AK'S PERFORMANCE: "CEOs Are Less Likely to Be Scored Below Target"

CEOs Are Less Likely to Be Scored Below Target

In addition to higher average annual incentive scores, individual CEO outcomes were much less likely to be scored below target and performance modifiers were less likely to decrease CEO outcomes.

As shown in the figure below, 31% of the aforementioned U.S. companies had below-target corporate scores vs. only 13% of individual CEO scores. Additionally, performance modifiers were four times more likely among S&P 500 companies to increase than decrease CEO annual incentive outcomes.

Meanwhile, 39% of S&P/TSX 60 corporate scorecards were below target, but only 26% of CEOs received below-target scores on their weighted component. No Canadian company used a modifier to decrease the annual bonus.

https://worldatwork.org/publications/workspan-daily/comparing-individual-ceo-performance-against-corporate-results


by
| 711 views | | 1 reply (September 21) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k5p6955q

1 reply

@OP

LOL ! That would be great.
The employees and the shareholders should grade him and I'm sure he's (Alvind) below target. After all, IBM is in a race to the bottom. And it ain't coming back.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k5p6955q

Post a reply

: