The AHM Q&A is heavily moderated filtering out awkward/inconvenient questions (checked myself). It is literally impossible to get a realistic picture of the business out that hype without admitting the existing issues. The ultimate fact is the share price is stagnant/dwindling for a number of years now but everytime there are excuses from the people who must take strategic decisions and are allegedly a talent that nobody wants loosing at the very expensive price. The question needs to be asked - "Are these people (CA and the gung) even cut to lead anything/anyone?" What do you think, folks.
2 replies (most recent on top)
Q: when will be the next layoff?
A: It will happen before I leave
Q: when will you step down?
A: it will happen after the next layoff
Q: why has your compensation increased?
A: because layoff and offshoring saves money
Q: why do we need layoff and offshoring?
A: for my compensation increase
Q: why is your performance good?
A: I do layoff and offshoring well
Q: why is layoff and offshoring good?
A: it reflects my good management performance
No…of course not. They never have been and never will. They have been given far too long to right this wonderful ship, and it’s now long past time that they are replaced with a team that knows how to support the shareholders. Us. To date, that effort has been an abject failure. One needs to look no further than P/e ratios. We have lost….we have been left behind, and there is nothing this exec team can do about it.