Thread regarding Charles Schwab Corp. layoffs

Covering a bad bet

RTO isn’t resisted because employees are lazy.
RTO is resisted because the justification was never about work.

Office real estate is a sunk cost but EC backs it as a strategy. Empty buildings is an executive embarrassment and wasted cash flow. Forcing RTO justifies cost on paper. They will never sell or write off a building as they would never admit a multimillion dollar mistake.

Avoiding layoffs and circumventing WARN compliance makes it all look clean. No severance, no bad press, no legal exposure. Comply or quit is being dressed up as culture and work ethic.

Productivity was great and is not the problem. Are you lying to yourself now or then. The same remote employee is somehow too lazy to be trusted yet also responsible for record numbers. The Schrödinger employee simultaneously a threat to productivity and the reason for your performance bonus. The contradiction is lunacy. Legacy leadership doesn’t measure outcomes they measure compliance and perception.

It’s easy to point at MD or EC and blame them for forcing this. Don’t confuse enforcers with architects. C-suite knows the numbers but that’s not what matters. Who holds power isn’t managers or CEO, it’s institutional shareholders. They control the votes and influence their compensation approval and decide if MDs keep their jobs. RTO isn’t pushed to help you, it doesn’t help Schwab, it’s to stay aligned with who has the voting power over their stock, bonuses, and seats. As much pressure as we are under, management is under a completely different kind of pressure. Why do you think multiple companies all make these changes within days of each other and they all tend to be more or less the same policy.

They say it’s about mentorship, culture, collaboration. If they believed what they said why is every meeting through a video anyway even when in office? How many meaningful mentoring hours actually happen in office? This logic doesn’t hold and just pushes the illusion.

This isn’t a growth strategy to make Schwab better. It is a reputation management strategy for people who don’t want to show any signs of faltering in a tightening market. When markets are volatile the playbook is control, RTO is the cheapest, loudest way to control regardless if it serves the business.

The same people who made those real estate bets and headcount decisions are doubling down to save face, doubling down on your time, your health, and your trust and saving nothing for you.

by
| 1641 views | | 6 replies (last August 2) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k1hsagp2

6 replies (most recent on top)

Smart, waste expenses for the company you work for, then complain about merit increase and bonus funding being too small.

That’ll show em

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gg+1k1hsagp2

I do my small part to drive up the operating costs in my building- punching the door opener to make sure the hot air gets in, extra paper towels, more than one flush of the toilet, accidentally filling my cup with too much ice, letting the sink run longer than it should, cups of coffee that I don’t drink.
If we’re being unnecessarily forced back in an extra day, I’ll consume their resources without regard.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f1+1k1hsagp2

Of course it’s not about collaboration or culture. People still take calls from their desks when they’re few rows from another. Half of them are so introverted and silent I don’t even know if they are alive. Water cooler conversations are the same everyday, talking about the weather and the latest vacation so and so took, and putting on that schwabnice face. I agree RTO in general based on wanting control over employees and following current industry standards, and also to make sure their real estate investment is put to a use (sorry STL folks).

But what are you gonna do about it? Are you gonna bite the hands that pay your bills and fund your lifestyle by saying FU to the new company policy next year? Good luck, I bet they will really crack down on this and make examples out of those who are non compliant. Don’t forget we all fall in the at-will employment agreement.

We have no control over what policies they set. As long as someone is paying you a salary you don’t have much options. If you didn’t need money you would’ve quit when RTO3 came out. Companies don’t want remote employees and it’s crystal clear in the news feed. Schwab gave us 6 months to figure it out or find a new gig that fits your lifestyle. Coddling days and exceptions are over, and rightfully within their rights as an employer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eq+1k1hsagp2

Schwab got tax breaks for some office locations (eg: Lone Tree) because the local government saw it as a sales tax benefit. That doesn’t materialize if no one goes in.

SOME managers can only get their rocks off properly if they see butts in seats every morning. They don’t know how to be effective when their workforce is remote (because they aren’t really effective in the first place).

It’s always going to be about the same old things. Money and control.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cc+1k1hsagp2

There are not even enough conference and meeting rooms in the office. but the management wants us to come to office for in person meetings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1k1hsagp2

RTO initially was about real estate values, I understood that -although I didn't like it. Why don't cities increase the tax burden on companies at 4-5 days a week in office? Like, that's significantly more wear and tear on roads. That's not going to happen though, TX needs that gas tax, TX economy needs you to pick up dinner instead of being home to cook. TX schools can't have you keeping your well-behaved, older smart kids doing homeschool. Our economy is run on consumption, schools scores are struggling without being bolstered by the over achievers...so we've got to get out of our homes and back to consuming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @by+1k1hsagp2

Post a reply

: