Thread regarding Five9 Inc. layoffs

The cherry on top (someone said that this was a routine procedure)

https://www.bfalaw.com/siteFiles/Cases/FIVNAmendedComplaintAsFiled.pdf

What’s at Issue?
Lucid alleges that, between February 21 and August 8, 2024, Five9 and its executives repeatedly told investors that the company’s revenue was solid and on track for 16% growth—just as it had guided in prior years. In reality, internal data showed sales were slumping, key artificial-intelligence products weren’t competitive, and the executive team had funneled in friends and family to shore up the numbers with shady tactics rather than genuine growth

Key Allegations:
Nepotism Hurt Sales: After Mike Burkland returned as CEO in late 2022, he promoted unqualified relatives and loyal supporters into sales leadership. That disrupted veteran teams and damaged customer relationships

Falling Behind on AI: While rivals invested heavily in AI-driven call-center tools, Five9 let its products stagnate. Customers tried Five9’s “Intelligent Virtual Agent” and others, but found them “rudimentary” and unsuitable—especially offshore, since Five9’s AI didn’t even work outside the U.S.

Internal Warnings Ignored: In weekly C-suite and “E-Staff” meetings, executives saw spreadsheets and Salesforce dashboards showing bookings and revenue were well below target. Yet they still publicly projected 16% growth for 2024

Desperate Revenue Hacks: To disguise the shortfall, the company:
Sneaked extra line charges onto invoices, knowingly breaching customer contracts and then coaching sales reps on how to deflect complaints;
Re-interpreted contracts to refuse seat-count reductions that customers had been promised;
Encouraged reps to promise capabilities Five9 didn’t actually deliver, resulting in implementation delays, de-bookings and unhappy clients who ultimately paid nothing

by
| 1281 views | | 8 replies (last June 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jypz4tkm

8 replies (most recent on top)

@ex wait til you find the Dan Burkland consulting offer letter after he "left" getting paid 400 an hour to consult tucky tuck

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vr+1jypz4tkm

@em is that what you got out of this you id--t?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rx+1jypz4tkm

The lawsuit reads like an episode from Succession! Can't wait for the Netflix docuseries

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ex+1jypz4tkm

C’mon guys…. It’s quite clear that the ex F9’rs mentioned in here are bitter

All of them were taking a big package, and not evolving or delivering

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @em+1jypz4tkm

Some very juicy nuggets in here...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1jypz4tkm

As appreciative as we are that Mike took us IPO, Andy is much more destined for the future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1jypz4tkm

This is a serious allegation man!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1jypz4tkm

Nepotism is ki-ling us - our c-suite now entirely exists of people on ‘invite to thanksgiving dinner’ basis. How the board isn’t actively routing this out is beyond me!

When Rowan first came in, a lot of us had concerns - but he built a marketing team filled with professionals, drove out product development to be well placed - and wouldn’t listen to a consultant literally paid to affirm his own beliefs. Our stock price soared (and before anyone says ‘but covid relaxed’ look how we’re performing against the rest of the bulls of the Covid era).

What an opportunity we had and squandered. Mike, you’re well respected - you took us public and you made a lot of people happy. When you stepped side, others took your place who could continue our strive for growth.

We used to be a company where we proudly said we had unlimited potential and we can fix any problem faced - now, we’re all scouring job sites looking for the door.

Ah well - all I know is that for everyone we lose, another company is getting a ridiculously fantastic employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jypz4tkm

Post a reply

: