Thread regarding State Street Corp. layoffs

Employment separation buyouts (Voluntary Exit Program) is the answer

State Street should seriously consider implementing employment separation buyouts through a Voluntary Exit Program for employees who are interested in leaving. I understand this was explored in the past, but the program was reportedly canceled due to unexpectedly high demand and costs. However, this time, the company could manage demand by creating a waiting list.

Buyout is a win-win situation. Instead of the playing this stupid cat & mouse game of force attrition and layoffs; employees who wish to leave could do so voluntarily with severance, and the company could avoid increased unemployment insurance costs. Meanwhile, the remaining staff could focus on their work without the constant anxiety of potential layoffs.

Current headcount reduction efforts are misguided. Management seems to underestimate how resilient State Street employees are—and how many have shown loyalty to the company for years, in some cases becoming so embedded in the organization that external opportunities are limited. These employees are unlikely to leave without having another job secured.

Quiet firing tactics such as mandating return to office—are ineffective. Finding internal US roles at State Street is already difficult, and the lack of privacy in the office makes it nearly impossible to search and interview for external positions discreetly. Cramped spaces, lack of available conference rooms, and general office distractions make it challenging to stay productive on our regular jobs, let alone coordinate a job search.

by
| 3702 views | | 9 replies (last August 1) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jyfj8e98

9 replies (most recent on top)

I don’t know exactly how the Buyout program looked in the past, but I want to set realistic expectations because not everybody is going to get what they want. The buyout isn't a full severance package, it’s a smaller payout. So not everyone will volunteer to leave based on their personal financial situation.

Think of it this way: at State Street, a severance might mean 2 weeks of pay for every year of service. So if you’ve been there 5 years, that’s 10 weeks of pay. But a Buyout could look more like 1 week per year, so just 5 weeks if you’ve been there 5 years.

It’s not for everyone, and that’s okay. But for some, it’s a way to part ways on more straightforward term...no more back-and-forth, no more guessing games. Just a clean break.

State Street execs: Layoff is costly (severance, unemployment insurance). What else can we do to mistreat the employee to force him to quit? We already found cheaper labor to replace the employee. I want my bonus!!

Employee: The company can be disrespectful and gaslight me all they want. I'm not quitting without a job line up. I hope this quarter I get laid off so I can receive my severance.

Solution: Buyout program

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5s6+1jyfj8e98

That won’t happen. I was working at State Street when the vsp was announced. Departments got decimated. Most of the lower level employees took the package.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5jt+1jyfj8e98

@5bt

They keep a few U.S workers who are then forced to do the work of 3 people with no added pay. Just added stress, added pressure from Mgmt.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5en+1jyfj8e98

That’s funny. Everyone would leave in the US. No one would be available to cover for the Indian team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5bt+1jyfj8e98

I was a relatively new employee when they did the voluntary buyout. My buyout sum then was a pittance. However, there were a few managers with ~30 years experience who made it quite well... And were hired as contractors for a spell.

If the company did the same now my package would be pretty good as I've been here 20+ years, so it might name sense for me to take it. But, seeing as I keep surviving the layoffs and my manager very clearly values me I'm the sort of employee State Street wants to keep. And the latest round has our team cut lean, even including the folks in India, so it'd be rough if I left.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bw+1jyfj8e98

I was there when they did this the last time and they lost a lot of people, including folks they very much did NOT want to leave. To the point where they had to rehire to replace key staff who bolted.

They were still talking about it 15+ years later and every time it was broached at a town hall the answer was invariably "He-l no - never again". Bottom line - If they can't control the people who are going to leave 100%, they won't do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gs+1jyfj8e98

@ae that was back when State Street still somewhat value their local US workers. More than 20 years later the company is making it obvious that they don't care about their US talent anymore besides SVP and above.

There are times at State Street where management passive aggressively try to push employees out. This is an even worst working experience for employees that being forced to quit each quarter and year because they were unable to find another job. As someone else wrote before it's like being stuck in an abusive relationship.

Instead of targeting specific employees or business units to quit, the company can offer to buy them out. This saves the company time and money (unemployment insurance) of laying people off that would have otherwise would have left anyways if given a buyout. Amazon and Google are doing buyouts now. I'm sure State Street can afford buyouts since the compnay made US$2.687 billion in net income in 2024.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jyfj8e98

The last time they did it was in 2003, and it was a disaster, and they ended up losing a lot of talent. IMHO, it will not happen again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jyfj8e98

Good talk, but no.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jyfj8e98

Post a reply

: