Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Op-ed: Reverse Darwinism At Play

Rather than nurture its best and brightest, Ford “selectively prunes” them!

Why would a company do this?

Two dark motivations:

  • Jealousy from within the ranks.
  • Cost/benefit calculations from above.

A toxic mix of professional jealousy and threatened egos means high achievers might be seen as “competition” to be eliminated rather than assets to be rewarded.

In effect, the deck is stacked – if you are a high performer but threaten someone’s ego or expose inconvenient truths, HR has people who understand how to “remove blockers” all right – except the “blocker” dealt with was you, the merit employee.

This cumulative picture is a deeply dysfunctional organization that would rather “break the legs of the fastest runners than fix the race”. By enforcing mediocrity through fear and purging, they remove voices that could call out wrongdoing – or achieve enough independence to expose it externally. It is a tragedy for the company’s innovation, but a deliberate strategy for short-term self-preservation by its power structure.

by
| 1281 views | | 5 replies (last May 23, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jvvkhqxz

5 replies (most recent on top)

The fact is, they don't care who they fire or keep in the US. They need just enough to train the replacements. Their big plan is to move as much as they can to Brazil, Mexico and India. Their plan in theory could work, but how they are applying it is in a panic mode and not building the required knowledge needed to design and sell cars people want. The re--rds at the top have created the chaotic situation. They are the people ki-ling moral and destroying the company in the process. FMC, rest in peace...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1jvvkhqxz

I don’t think the ones succeeding really win either friend @prev comment

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1jvvkhqxz

I think it also has a lot to do with risk-taking. If you stick you neck out and try to do something innovative, there is typically an associated risk. If you fail, your peers and most likely your boss will use that against you and it will stay with you forever and severely impact your career. This 'fail fast' philosophy was probably right but not enough of the top leadership demonstrated or even supported it. That's why there are really no leaders, just managers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1jvvkhqxz

"PETERS" at Ford are promoted jokes and id--ts - one after another.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jvvkhqxz

Well said and most importantly an astute observation. "HR has people who understand how to “remove blockers” all right". It's just too bad that HR fails to realize that in most instances blocking happens at the top and middle layers of management and NOT the bottom of salaried ranks. I do disagree with your statement about threatened egos. It's more likely their insecurity in their intelligence /lack thereof as perceived by their direct reports. But hey, if the shoe fits.... The Peter Principle (Google it) is usually the root cause of poor corporate performance. As big as Ford is, you and many others just might agree that it just has far too many "PETERS" in its managerial positions making destructive decisions. So, if I understand your LL levels and the urgent need to correct company performance IMMEDIATELY, how many LL6, LL5, LL4 and LL3's got the axe for disastrous product design and sales performance? I'm just AXING?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jvvkhqxz

Post a reply

: