Agree with above. I was slightly involved for the first time because my team was directly impacted. Before I just heard via the rumor mill like all us saps. I had a managing director that had even told me that she was one of these lists… a friend saw it and warned her.
Any way what I experienced is like you said they gather up people under a managing director … the managing director asks those reporting to him to get a list and rank people on your team. Then it is discussed I believe by the VPs and managing director or maybe directors and they decide from there who is at the bottom… not sure how they decide… is it that there are too many officers, AVPs, individual contributors? Who has lowest performance, salary factor in? Who knows how the final decision is.
So yeah these discussions were going on probably around March when budget cuts are decided which typically prompts these. I am not sure how much in advance it is known directly who will be let go. But the list is started and presented well in advance.
Then there is a day chosen that those final cuts are presented to those impacted … they have two months to find another job internally where their workload is decreased so they have time to work with the talent group to find other suitable employment. If they don’t in that two months, they are officially laid off and their severe kicks in.