Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

I Agree we do need a Strike!

I know HR is all over any post mentioning strike. But workers need to level set with our corporate masters. I agree with the Strike posts.

by
| 1161 views | | 10 replies (last April 29, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jsyrvwj7

10 replies (most recent on top)

strike? bah ha ha ha ha.

Strikes are for workers who produce products consumers want to buy.

When the workers belong to a company that is failing, there are no profits for the workers to demand a share of.

This Intel board seems to have the most uneducated workers in the U.S. Maybe that should not be a surprise.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1jsyrvwj7

Put the bo-g down already, your pipe dreams are just that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1jsyrvwj7

What are your demands, OP? That customers buy more Intel product? Intel is in this mess not because wages are bad but because revenues and profits deteriorated as a result of lackluster products.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jsyrvwj7

Hey, people. At the moment, Intel gets 90% of its sales from 7nm (the main moneymaker is Kiryat Gat), and the remaining 10% from 4nm (Leixlip). You can go on strikes here in the US until Christmas, which will only give managers and HR an additional criterion before the upcoming layoffs, while in Israel and Ireland they will simply increase the wafer start. Well, maybe they will start another taskforce - "out max" and will finally get good quarterly bonus.
I would also surprise if somebody from IDC Haifa will participate either strikes: Israel has very tight job market to loss opportunity be hired by either high tech company in future.
I can not also imagine that somebody from 12,143 Intel H1B visa holders will take part in either strike.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jsyrvwj7

Folks who want to strike are fooling themselves. What would you strike over that everyone would agree? Would CW workers strike so admin and HR continue to work from home? Old fashioned strikes were for things like better safety, 40 hour work weeks, non-discrimination in hiring, none of which would apply to us. The things that have ruined the company are market forces and decisions made by the company 10-15 years ago. The time to have had a strike was in 2016 when they did headcount reductions that were so badly managed that the company apologized for later.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jsyrvwj7

Yes we do need a strike. I agree. As I understand it organization has begun. I received an email.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jsyrvwj7

Warning. It takes ba--s. but it is also one of life's few areas where a normal working class people can become overnight heroes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jsyrvwj7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbeKBiCenLM

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jsyrvwj7

I don't believe OP wants to remain employed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jsyrvwj7

UAW Detroit notes on striking. Not many will commit ahead of time (Concerned about being seen as agitator) but there's is power in numbers. You will be surprised how many will participate upon request (Lets go!) the day of. Each location needs a leader. On the agreed date and time you need someone rounding up the folks and sending them outside. (Act official) Its scary, its haphazard but it works.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1jsyrvwj7

Post a reply

: