Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

What is 20% cut in head count numbers?

What is the current headcount? Will this 20% be higher or lower than 15% cut last time, in terms of headcount numbers?

We're all groups uniformly affected in the last cut?

by
| 2551 views | | 9 replies (last April 23, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jsh999t3

9 replies (most recent on top)

22k is what our HR rep is saying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jsh999t3

So, going by 2024 layoffs and the hiring after that, a 20% layoff will result only 10-12% reduction as hiring will be huge after that....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1jsh999t3

The layers of management has been a stagnation issue with Intel for over decade. I am happy to see where this will lead. This seems like the right layoffs this time. We will see what the end result will be.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jsh999t3

Revenue per employee is still far below the rest of the industry.

In the early 2000s, layoffs usually resulted in no more than 90k and often 80k remaining, so this is merely getting back to what was at one time the benchmark.

Problem is that revenue is soft so LBT really needs to take this further, but that involves selling or shutting down at least 1 fab and doing the same with a number of product groups.

That's where this has to go but not something that can be done immediately.

stay tuned..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jsh999t3

A lot of people about to loose their homes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jsh999t3

I thought Intel was sub-100k after the 15% cuts last year. How are we still at 107k?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jsh999t3

Many of us have been predicting this for years. It's pretty easy to see how to get to the 20% number.

Just look at the terrible quarterly operating cash flows and work backwards as to how many heads you have to cut to get back to no red ink.

Sad fact of life, you can't light cash on fire and expect the bonfire to last too long.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jsh999t3

Intel is at 107k so approximated 21-22K

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jsh999t3

Post a reply

: