Thread regarding SAS Institute layoffs

Why hasn't JMP been sold?

JMP is a subsidiary. When JMP became a subsidiary, the JMP part of the company became a separate legal entity, distinct from the parent company. This separation can simplify the sale process of JMP because the subsidiary can be sold without affecting the parent company's operations or assets.

Clearly, JMP's best chance of preservation is to be sold separately from SAS. Being a subsidiary makes that process easier. Perhaps that was the intention years back for making JMP a subsidiary.

Speculations as to why JMP has not been sold?

by
| 1231 views | | 6 replies (last April 8, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jr5q9eez

6 replies (most recent on top)

It’s not his decision. JS is the minority partner; he owns 1/3 of SAS, and 1/3 of JMP. 



At this point, both owners have to be thinking about estate planning. A software company is an awkward asset to leave your children, particularly when they’ve expressed no interest in it.

So while the decision is JG’s, I expect both owners agree that it’s time to sell. They’ve talked with Broadcom, and possibly other potential buyers. If no buyer offers a reasonable price, they’ve made plans to IPO.

If the owners have decided to sell, they must also have decided that they’ll get their best price selling JMP as a subsidiary of SAS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jm+1jr5q9eez

Maybe John just doesn’t want to sell?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gh+1jr5q9eez

JS likes the waiting game better than quick sale. He does not behave like a man who has much of a life outside of JMP. Case in point: People who name stuff after themself usually do not have much of a life outside of that stuff. JMP has been the majority of his life.

Playing with JMP until a sale/IPO then folding is his best play. He is too old to go with JMP post sale/IPO and likely would have a ego insulting diminished if he stayed on post sale/IPO.

Finally. his kids have no interest in JMP. Add it all together and you see that there is no other play that comes close.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ax+1jr5q9eez

JS might prefer to deal with a familiar, even unpleasant, situation than to risk an unknown one that could be worse.
If that is true, JS plays his hand with his baby until a sale or IPO then folds.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jr5q9eez

“Speculations as to why JMP has not been sold?”

I was told that it was discussed at the highest level of the company whether to spin off JMP, Risk, and Fraud. I believe all three are profitable, so spinoffs might be attractive.

But the decision was taken instead to make JMP a subsidiary. At the same time, the airplanes were also put into a subsidiary. This makes it easy for any buyer to keep or sell these subsidiaries, depending on whether they fit their business model.

SAS owners must feel that they'll get a better price selling the company as a whole, giving the buyer the option of selling off the parts.

"Clearly, JMP's best chance of preservation is to be sold separately from SAS."

You're right. That's a different issue. It's not clear whether they are trying to preserve it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jr5q9eez

“Speculations as to why JMP has not been sold?”

Probably because JS is still alive and kicking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jr5q9eez

Post a reply

: