Thread regarding ExxonMobil Corp. layoffs

Are we in a managed decline?

Exxon used to be a powerhouse—loud, political, and unapologetically Republican. Prior to 2016, they spammed us with emails daily, pushing us to vote red. Now? Crickets. No talk about Trump, no mention of Elon, just this weird retreat into things like carbon capture and biofuels. It’s like after 2016, they got checkmated and negotiated a slow-motion collapse. And wow, is it slow.

Everything feels fake. The people, the work, the endless meetings that lead nowhere. No one follows up on anything because nothing actually matters. They’ve outsourced all the engineering jobs to India, where the skill gap is obvious, but no one cares because the goal isn’t to get things done—it’s to keep up the illusion.

Which makes me wonder—was Exxon ever really just a business, or was it something else entirely? It expanded across the world, embedding itself in key regions, just like USAID does under the banner of "development." Was Exxon really just another tool to get U.S. influence locked in globally? And if so, did they lose their usefulness after 2016?

I remember about 25 years ago, my uncle and another oil and gas vendor found out I joined Exxon. At the time, I was very young, enthusiastic, and thrilled to be permanently employed with such a well-known company. But they weren’t impressed. They were familiar with Exxon to the extent they made a comment, "I don’t understand how they make money. They're inefficient and have bizarre decision-making processes." And now, all these years later, I can’t help but agree. Darren confirmed that, of course, we zig when others zag. Lol. What kind of funhouse mirror game are we playing?

So I have to ask—how do the rest of you feel? Do you see the same decline, or are you still playing along with the charade?

by
| 1812 views | | 8 replies (last March 30, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jqd6byzm

8 replies (most recent on top)

How does your theory - and timeline - align with ExxonMobil's Republican CEO being dazzled and recruited by the antichrist that has charmed America, to work as his Secretary of State for a whopping 13 months before sht being canned on f***ing Twitter? Maybe that's when the politics of XOM started to shift.

Ever consider that?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nj+1jqd6byzm

No duh

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1jqd6byzm

We do what BP does, but about a decade later. As BP recognizes their failures and exits a doomed strategy is about the same time we pull the trigger and jump into it. Adopting failed environmental policies that are dependent on govt subsidies to be economical are just the icing on the xom failure cake

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1jqd6byzm

KM and Amman are definitely Blue. No doubt about it. It's too late to change that now. Checkmate.... Hahahaha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1jqd6byzm

We have lost our way. We used to have technical capability. No way we can execute any arctic project these days. We are entirely dependent on vendors now. Look at the old papers URC and EMDC published. We have zero ability to do that type of work now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jqd6byzm

When I saw more than three Obama stickers on cars in the campus garage on my walk to W1 each day, I knew it was time to get out of there.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jqd6byzm

Seek professional help

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1jqd6byzm

We turned blue the day we lost the proxy fight and Blackrock put three leftists on our board and assigned KM to our management committee in exchange for letting DW keep his job. It’s not complicated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1jqd6byzm

Post a reply

: